Background: Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory granulomatous disease affecting multiple organ systems. Neurosarcoidosis (CNS involvement) is seen in approximately 25% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis, although it is subclinical in most of these cases. Because of its rarity, exposure of neurologists to the clinical spectrum of NS is limited to case reports or short case series.

Patients and Methods: A database of 3900 patients treated at the Vanderbilt Multiple Sclerosis Clinic between 1995 and 2008 was searched for ‘neurosarcoidosis’, ‘neurosarcoid’, ‘sarcoidosis’ and ‘sarcoid’. Of the 162 patient records that were retrieved, 54 patients were found to meet the criteria for definite, probable or possible neurosarcoidosis and were reviewed, including their clinical presentation, Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs), biopsy results, treatment, and where available, outcomes 4 months to 20 years after onset of the presenting illness.

Results: Clinical presentations and imaging findings in NS were varied. Cranial nerve abnormalities were the most common clinical presentation and involvement of the optic nerve in particular was associated with a poor prognosis for visual recovery. Isolated involvement of lower cranial nerves had a more favorable outcome. T₂ hyperintense parenchymal lesions were the most common imaging finding followed by meningeal enhancement. Long-term treatment consisted of prednisone and/or other immunomodulators (azathioprine, methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil).

Conclusions: Unlike systemic sarcoidosis, there is difficulty in making tissue diagnosis when involvement of CNS is suspected. MRI and CSF studies are sensitive in the detection of CNS inflammation but lack specificity, making the ascertainment of neurosarcoidosis a clinical challenge. In addition the low prevalence of the disease makes clinical trials difficult and therapeutic decisions are likely to be made from careful reporting from case studies.

Design: Pilot cohort study.

Methods: Patients—(i) Bradycardia-pacing group: Consecutive patients referred for pacing for SND, AVB and CSS; (ii) Consecutive head-up tilt (HUT)-positive VVS patients. Controls—(i) Simple controls (S-Con: normal examination/ECG) and (ii) Electrophysiology controls (EP-Con: consecutive subjects referred for accessory pathway ablation). Pacing referrals and EP-Con had electrophysiology studies to confirm referral diagnosis and exclude others. All subjects had bolus injection of 20 mg intravenous adenosine during continuous ECG and blood pressure monitoring (positive test: >=6 s asystole, >=10 s high-degree AVB post-injection). Sensitivity, specificity, safety and tolerability of the test were measured.

Results: Of 264 potential participants (4 SND, 8 AVB, 7 CSS, 10 VVS, 10 EP-Con and 11 S-Con) 50 were studied. All (100%) of the bradycardia-pacing group were adenosine test-positive, as were 6 (60%) VVS. None (0%) and 3 (27%) of the EP- and S-Con groups were positive. Adenosine testing was 100% sensitive and 86% specific for bradycardia-pacing indications, and 100% specific using the diagnostically ‘clean’ EP-Con results. There were no significant adverse or side effects.

Conclusions: Adenosine testing reliably identified patients with definitive bradycardia-pacing indications in whom alternative diagnoses were excluded. Further work is needed to evaluate the role of this test in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope.

Aims: To determine whether basal circulating cortisol levels predict coronary artery (CAD) or peripheral vascular disease.

Methods: Basal plasma cortisol levels were measured in 278 subjects with suspected CAD, who had undergone elective coronary angiography and in 76 cases and 85 controls with and without peripheral vascular disease, respectively.

Results: After adjustment for potential confounding factors, circulating cortisol levels tended to be lower in those with confirmed coronary vessel disease at angiography (P = 0.10), and in those requiring intervention following angiography (P = 0.07). Lower cortisol levels also predicted those with more symptoms of angina (P = 0.01). Cortisol levels were no different in those with or without peripheral vascular disease.

Conclusion: A single measurement of circulating cortisol is a poor predictor of vascular disease. More detailed characterization of the HPA axis is necessary to determine the role of circulating endogenous glucocorticoids and their responsiveness to stress in atherosclerosis.

Aim: To quantify the incidence and mortality of falls amongst older people in primary care in the UK.

Methods: Cohort study of people aged >=60 years and registered in a UK practice contributing data to The Health Improvement Network primary care database (THIN) throughout 2003–06. Analysis of crude incidence and estimation of incidence rate ratios using negative binomial regression, and survival using Cox regression. Sensitivity analysis of criteria for distinguishing discrete fall events from follow-up appointments.

Results: Amongst people aged >=60 years the overall crude incidence rate of recorded falls was 3.58/100 person-years (95% CI 3.56–3.61). The rate of recurrent falls was 0.67/100 person-years (95% CI 0.66–0.68). The incidence rate of recorded falls and recurrent falls was higher in older age groups, in women and least advantaged social groups. Incidence of recorded falls was constant through the time period 2003–06. Mortality for recurrent fallers was about twice that of general population controls.

Conclusions: These data suggest that more than 475 000 fall events in older people are recorded in general practice each year in the UK, and are associated with increased mortality and relative deprivation. The underlying incidence rate has remained stable in recent years.

Aim: To investigate the reasons for, and morbidity associated with, overlooked pacing indications.

Design: Prospective observational study in a UK regional pacing centre and its referring district hospitals.

Methods: Hospital records from referring and implanting centres were reviewed for 95 consecutive patients undergoing first pacemaker implant to determine symptoms, investigations and hospitalisations occurring after documentation of a pacing indication.

Results: Thirty-three of ninety-five patients (35%) had a pacing indication overlooked, which was Class I in 14 patients and Class IIa in 19. Reasons for not making a pacing referral in these patients included: failure to recognize the indication in 14, making adjustments to potentially culprit medication in 15 and requesting additional ‘confirmatory’ tests in 4. Twenty-six patients (79%) with missed indications experienced adverse events after documentation of an indication, and before receiving a pacemaker: 23 had ongoing symptoms (including one cardiac arrest), three received temporary pacing wires and 18 were hospitalized with symptoms related to cardiac rhythm. Twenty-seven patients (82%) had a total of 38 additional specialist investigations after documentation of a pacing indication.

Conclusions: Documentation of an indication for pacing failed to trigger referral for permanent pacing in 35% of patients. This failure led to significant delays, morbidity and use of health service resource, which may have been avoided if timely recognition of the pacing indication had prompted referral. Failure to recognize pacing indications and reassessing symptoms and repeating investigation after changes to medication, often required for the management of associated tachyarrhythmias or other medical conditions, contribute to these delays, perhaps unnecessarily.