QJM Advance Access published online on March 10, 2009
QJM, doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp025
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenditure and value for money: the challenge of implantable cardioverter defibrillators
From the Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Address correspondence to Prof. Giuseppe Boriani, Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. email: giuseppe.boriani{at}unibo.it
| Abstract |
|---|
Many technology-driven interventions entail considerable financial cost, raising affordability issues. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a case of an effective primary prevention intervention with high initial costs that is capable of delivering long-term population benefits. At first glance, such interventions may provoke diffidence, if not active resistance, due to the financial burdens which inevitably accompany their widespread adoption. In this article, we review the available economic tools that can help address the ICD cost issue. We think awareness of such knowledge may facilitate dialogues between physicians, administrators and policymakers, and help foster rational decision-making.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Boriani, M. Biffi, C. Martignani, C. Valzania, I. Diemberger, M. Bertini, G. Domenichini, M. Ziacchi, and A. Branzi Is cardiac resynchronization therapy cost-effective? Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(suppl_5): v93 - v97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
