Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access first published online on November 28, 2008
This version published online on December 2, 2008
QJM, doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn158
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/81    most recent
hcn158v2
hcn158v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, G. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

History of the cholesterol controversy in Britain*

G. R. Thompson

From the Department of Metabolic Medicine, Division of Investigative Sciences, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, Ducane Road, London W12 0NN, UK

Address correspondence to Professor G. Thompson, Department of Metabolic Medicine, Division of Investigative Sciences, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, Ducane Road, London W12 0NN. email: g.thompson{at}imperial.ac.uk


  Abstract

The lipid hypothesis, the concept that cholesterol plays a causal role in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, has been the subject of a controversy which started in the 1950s, peaked in the 1970s and 80s and then subsided in the 1990s. It was finally resolved by the positive outcome of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study, the first of 14 prevention trials using statins which showed that lowering cholesterol reduced both cardiovascular events and total mortality. This commentary focuses primarily on the events and people involved in the cholesterol controversy in Britain. The foremost critics of the lipid hypothesis are now deceased but unfortunately for many of the patients with hypercholesterolaemia and coronary heart disease it took the best part of 50 years to disprove the sceptics. This brief account relates why it took so long.

The original version was incorrect. An error to a sentence on page 2 has been amended

*This article is based on the author's book ‘The Cholesterol Controversy’ (ISBN 978-1-85315-802-5), published by the RSM Press.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 QJMHome page
D. S. Grimes
History of the cholesterol hypothesis in Britain
QJM, June 1, 2009; 102(6): 436 - 438.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.