QJM Advance Access published online on August 8, 2008
QJM, doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn099
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When it is better to estimate a slope with only one point
From the 1INSERM U897 Epidemiology & Biostatistics 2Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, F-33076 Bordeaux, France 3Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Child Health, University College London and 4Medical Research Council – Clinical Trial Unit, London, UK
Address correspondence to R. Thiébaut, INSERM U897 Epidemiology & Biostatistics, ISPED, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 146 rue Léo Saignat 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France. email: rodolphe.thiebaut{at}isped.u-bordeaux2.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
When investigating the change in a biomarker, it is often believed that at least two measurements are needed from each participant, and that those with only one measurement should be excluded. In this short note, we explain why this could lead to imprecise and biased estimates. Furthermore, we discuss a standard statistical method that handles such issues.