Skip Navigation



QJM Advance Access published online on July 11, 2008

QJM, doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/9/731    most recent
hcn078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dillon, M.F.
Right arrow Articles by O'shea, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dillon, M.F.
Right arrow Articles by O'shea, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Factors that affect longevity of intravenous cannulas: a prospective study

M.F. Dillon1,2, J. Curran1, R. Martos1, C. Walsh3, J. Walsh1, D. Al-Azawi1, C.S. Lee1 and D. O'shea1,4

1From the St Vincent's Private Hospital, Elm Park, 2Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, 3Department of Statistics, Trinity College and 4Department of Medicine, St Vincent's; University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Address correspondence to Mary Dillon, Department of Surgery, Education and Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. email: maryfdillon{at}hotmail.com

Received 31 March 2008 and in revised form 9 June 2008


   Abstract

Background: Few guidelines exist to guide medical personnel on the most successful means of achieving sustained intravenous cannulation. This study examines the impact of gauge and site of intravenous cannulas (IC) on the longevity of ICs in hospitalized patients.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 500 ICs inserted into patients of St Vincent's Private hospital from December 2005 to June 2006. Patients were followed until the IC had been removed or changed. Statistical analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards.

Results: Of the 500 ICs inserted, 37% were 18 g, 46% were 20 g and 18% were 22 g. Gauge of IC was the most significant predictor of increased longevity of IC (P = 0.0002, RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.08–1.27). The median survival of 18, 20 and 22 g were 57 h (95% CI 49–72), 43 h (95% CI 36–48.5) and 29 h (95% CI 24–40.5), respectively. The site of IC placement influenced the longevity of ICs (P = 0.005, RR= 0.7, 95% CI 0.55–0.9), as did male gender (P = 0.03, RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.6–0.97). However in subgroup analysis, the most marked effect on IC longevity was evident in those patients with 18 g placed in the forearm/wrist (median 72 h) with less marked changes in other site/gauge combinations. In contrast, 22 g ICs placed in the hand had a median lifespan of 29 h.

Conclusion: IC gauge and site of placement are important factors in determining IC longevity. 18 g ICs placed in the forearm/wrist can considerably increase the longevity of ICs and should be attempted in patients who require sustained cannulation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.