QJM Advance Access published online on May 6, 2005
QJM, doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci065
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 From the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Rotterdam, The Netherlands; From the Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background: Randomized trials have shown that integrating services for acute stroke care may lead to organizational improvements, higher efficiency and better patient outcomes in the acute phase. Aim: To compare the costs and effects of stroke services in an experimental group of patients compared to a group of patients receiving conventional care. Design: Prospective non-randomized controlled trial. Methods: We compared all consecutively hospitalized stroke patients in three experimental stroke service settings (Delft, Haarlem and Nijmegen, n = 411) with concurrent patients receiving conventional stroke care (n = 187) over 6 months follow-up. Main end-points were total costs per patient and total health-adjusted days per 100 patients as measured by the EuroQol-5D score during follow-up. Results: Mean total costs per patient were Discussion: Our study confirms the potential to improve stroke outcomes in a cost-effective way in Dutch settings. This was seen in the group of patients in Delft, a complete and relatively simple stroke service, but not in two other regions with more complex stroke services. Important factors are reduction of hospital days and, most likely, adequate multidisciplinary rehabilitation.
Received August 24, 2004
Revised January 12, 2005
Original article
Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services
2 From the Department of Cardiology, Clinical Epidemiology & Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3 From the Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
N.J.A. van Exel, E-mail: n.vanexel{at}erasmusmc.nl
![]()
Abstract
16 000 (95%CI
14 670-
16 930):
13 160 in Delft,
16 790 in Haarlem,
20 230 in Nijmegen, and
13 810 in the control regions. Early discharge in Delft saved about
2500 hospital costs per patient. General patient health in Delft was significantly better than in the control regions; Haarlem and Nijmegen showed no difference in health.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Luengo-Fernandez, A. M. Gray, and P. M. Rothwell Costs of Stroke Using Patient-Level Data: A Critical Review of the Literature Stroke, February 1, 2009; 40(2): e18 - e23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M.T. Schouten, M. E.J.L. Hulscher, R. Akkermans, J. J.E. van Everdingen, R. P.T.M. Grol, and R. Huijsman Factors That Influence the Stroke Care Team's Effectiveness in Reducing the Length of Hospital Stay Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2515 - 2521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lo, K. Zamel, K. Ponnappa, A. Allen, D. Chisolm, M. Tang, B. Kerlin, and K. O. Yeates The Cost of Pediatric Stroke Care and Rehabilitation Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 161 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
