© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Commentaries |
Neuroleptics reconsidered
Address correspondence to Dr A. Daniels. email: anthony.daniels@wanadoo.fr
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Introduction |
|---|
This is a response to the Commentary by Dr Charlton (Why are doctors still prescribing neuroleptics?) in this issue of QJM.10 Perhaps it would be best to begin by summarizing his argument.
He states that neuroleptics do not cure schizophrenia, that they create dependency, and that they have many undesirable side-effects, even fatal ones. He states that, insofar as they appear to effect an improvement in the condition for which they are prescribed, it is by means of some of the very effects that are generally deemed undesirable, namely Parkinsonism and over-sedation. In other words, the desired and undesired effects are one and the same. Finally, he states that the undesired effects are so bad that it would be better if patients were treated with safer sedatives, such as benzodiazepines.
| Neuroleptics not a cure for schizophrenia |
|---|
As far as I am aware, no one has ever claimed, or at least not for a long time, that
| Unwanted effects of neuroleptics |
|---|
| The identity of desired and undesired effects |
|---|
| Suggested treatment with benzodiazepines |
|---|
| Conclusions |
|---|