Skip Navigation

QJM 2006 99(4):231-236; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcl026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newton, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, R.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newton, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, R.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Calcaneal bone mineral density in older patients who have fallen

J.L. Newton1,2,, D.E.J. Jones2, K. Wilton1, J. Pairman1, S.W. Parry1,2 and R.M. Francis2,3

From the 1Falls and Syncope Service, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, 2School of Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, and 3Musculoskeletal Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Address correspondence to Dr J.L. Newton, Care of the Elderly Offices, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP. email: julia.newton{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk

Received 4 October 2005 and in revised form 31 January 2006

Background: Annually, 35–40% of those aged >65 years fall; up to 5% of such falls result in fracture. Fracture is determined both by propensity to fall and by bone fragility.

Aim: To determine osteoporosis prevalence and predictors in patients who have fallen.

Design: Observational cross-sectional study.

Methods: We measured calcaneal BMD in 408 consecutive patients aged >50 years attending after falling. Fall number, fracture history, weight, height, and risk factors for falls and osteoporosis were recorded. T scores (SD above or below the mean for young adults) were derived in both sexes, and Z scores (SD above or below age-related normal score) in females.

Results: In females (n = 300, 74%), mean (SD) T score was –1.1(1.6), and mean Z score was 0(1.4); 127 (42%) had osteoporosis (T score < – 1.6). ROC curves confirmed significant relationships between osteoporosis and age, weight and height (all p < 0.0001). Incorporating fracture history, our model (fracture aged >50 years, age >83 years, weight <57 kg, height <153 cm as dichotomous variables) predicted osteoporosis with 91% sensitivity, 34% specificity. Of 108 male fallers, 36 (33%) had osteoporosis. Age, height and weight all predicted osteoporosis (p < 0.02). The resulting model (fracture aged >50 years, age >=80 years, weight <=68 kg, height <=167 cm as dichotomous variables) predicted osteoporosis with 92% sensitivity, 30% specificity.

Discussion: Osteoporosis prevalence is not increased in female fallers compared to age-related norms; empirical use of osteoporosis treatment solely on the basis of falls thus appears inappropriate. In both sexes, the factors predicting osteoporosis were age, height and weight. Where BMD is not practical, possible or economical, our model may be a sensitive means of predicting fallers with osteoporosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.