Skip Navigation

QJM 2005 98(3):183-190; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blank, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blank, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Regional differences in the provision of adult renal dialysis services in the UK

L. Blank1, J. Peters1, A. Lumsdon2, D.J. O'Donoghue3, T.G. Feest4, J. Scoble5, J.P. Wight1,6 and J. Bradley7

From the 1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, 2The National Kidney Research Fund, 3Renal Unit, Hope Hospital, Salford, 4Richard Bright Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, 5Department of Renal Medicine, Guys Hospital, London, 6North Sheffield Primary Care Trust, Sheffield, and 7Department of Renal Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge

Received 9 July 2004 and in revised form 12 November 2004

Background: Provision of renal dialysis varies between UK regions.

Aim: To analyse these differences in provision and investigate their causes.

Design: Questionnaire-based survey.

Methods: A questionnaire was posted to all renal provider units and renal commissioning groups in the UK. Questions covered issues such as dialysis modalities and patient choice. Data were collected by telephone interview (or post in some cases) and analysed using SPSS.

Results: All renal provider units in the UK responded. A full range of modalities was provided by the majority of units. Clear variations in the level and quality of dialysis provision were seen between the UK regions. These included variation in choice of dialysis modality, provision of high-cost drugs, vascular access waiting times, number of support staff and availability of spare dialysis slots.

Discussion: The considerable variation between UK regions in the provision of adult renal dialysis services cannot be entirely explained by age or ethnic variation, and is in part due to limited bed space, dialysis machines and support staff, as well as changes in commissioning arrangements. To meet the requirements of the renal national service framework in most regions, changes to policy and funding will be required, such that the relatively new commissioning groups implement more appropriate funding structures in closer dialogue with their provider units.

Address correspondence to Dr L. Blank, Section of Public Health, ScHARR, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA. e-mail: l.blank{at}sheffield.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. Yamada, R. Furuya, T. Takita, Y. Maruyama, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Ohkawa, and H. Kumagai
Simplified nutritional screening tools for patients on maintenance hemodialysis
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 106 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.