Skip Navigation

QJM 2004 97(9):569-574; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hch097
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porthouse, J.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porthouse, J.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

QJM vol. 97 no. 9 © Association of Physicians 2004; all rights reserved.

Risk factors for fracture in a UK population: a prospective cohort study

J. Porthouse, Y.F. Birks, D.J. Torgerson, S. Cockayne, S. Puffer and I. Watt

From the York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

Received 20 February 2004 and in revised form 12 May 2004

Background: Common clinical risk factors for fracture in older women have been identified. To date, most of these risk factors have not been confirmed in a UK population.

Aim: To confirm the important risk factors for fracture in older women.

Design: Comprehensive cohort study (CCS) with a nested randomized controlled trial.

Methods: The CCS included 4292 women aged >70 years. We assessed potential risk factors for fracture, and followed-up participants for 24 months for incidence of non-vertebral fractures.

Results: Odds ratios (ORs) for predicting any non-vertebral fracture were: previous fracture, 2.67 (95%CI 2.10–3.40); a fall in the last 12 months, 2.06 (95%CI 1.63–2.59); and age (per year increase), 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.05). ORs for predicting hip fracture were: previous fracture, 2.31 (95%CI 1.31–4.08); low body weight (<58 kg), 2.20 (95%CI 1.28–3.77); maternal history of hip fracture, 1.68 (95%CI 0.85–3.31); a fall in the last 12 months, 2.92 (95%CI 1.70–5.01); and age (per year increase), 1.09 (95%CI 1.04–1.13). ORs for predicting wrist fracture were: previous fracture, 2.29 (95%CI 1.56–3.34); and a fall in the last 12 months, 1.60 (95%CI 1.10–2.31). Being a current smoker was not associated with an increase in risk, and was consistent across all fracture types.

Discussion: Older women with the clinical risk factors identified in this study should be investigated for osteoporosis or offered preventive treatment.

Address correspondence to: Dr J. Porthouse, York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Area 4, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University Of York, York YO10 5DD. e-mail: jp38{at}york.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
H. Cox, S. Puffer, V. Morton, C. Cooper, J. Hodson, T. Masud, D. Oliver, D. Preedy, P. Selby, M. Stone, et al.
Educating nursing home staff on fracture prevention: a cluster randomised trial
Age Ageing, March 1, 2008; 37(2): 167 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. M. Clark, A. R. Ness, J. H. Tobias, and and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Chi
Adipose Tissue Stimulates Bone Growth in Prepubertal Children
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2534 - 2541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Large, N. Gan, D. Basic, and N. Jennings
Using the Timed Up and Go Test to stratify elderly inpatients at risk of falls
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2006; 20(5): 421 - 428.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.