Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by France, M.W.
Right arrow Articles by Seneviratne, C.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by France, M.W.
Right arrow Articles by Seneviratne, C.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2003; 96: 919-923
© Association of Physicians 2003; all rights reserved.

Ethnic trends in lipid tests in general practice

M.W. France1, S. Kwok2, P. McElduff3 and C.J. Seneviratne4

From the 1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, 2Barlow Medical Centre, Manchester, 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Manchester, and 4Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK

Background: South Asian migrants have a higher cardiovascular mortality than the indigenous population. Contributory factors may include a lower rate of cardiovascular risk assessment uptake and compliance.

Aim: To compare rates of lipid testing, follow-up and patterns of dyslipidaemia in South Asian and non-South-Asian populations in Manchester.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional survey.

Methods: Lipid requests from 14 general practices were analysed, using name recognition software to assign ethnicity.

Results: Compared with non-South-Asians, the age-standardized rate of lipid testing in South Asians was similar in men at 12.1% (95%CI 11.6–12.6) vs. 11.2% (9.5–13.0), but higher in women at 18.6% (15.9–21.2) vs. 13.2% (12.6–13.7). Trends of cholesterol with repeat testing were similar in the two populations. However, South Asian women had lower mean levels of total cholesterol (5.50 vs. 5.68 mmol/l, p = 0.021), lower levels of HDL (1.20 vs. 1.46 mmol/l, p < 0.001), an excess of hypertriglyceridaemia (1.62 vs. 1.45 mmol/l, p = 0.035) and a greater proportion with cholesterol > 5.2 mmol/l combined with low HDL (43.1% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.002). South Asian men had lower levels of total cholesterol (5.17 vs. 5.37 mmol/l, p = 0.048) and lower levels of HDL (1.07 vs. 1.64 mmol/l, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the proportion of South Asians men and women with cholesterol < 5.2 mmol/l combined with low HDL.

Discussion: The rate of lipid testing and change in cholesterol levels with repeated testing did not differ between South Asian and non-South-Asian groups. The pattern of dyslipidaemia seen in this South Asian population, especially women, was different from that of the non-South-Asian population, with possible implications for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Address correspondence to Dr M.W. France, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, CMMCUH NHS Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL. e-mail: mfrance{at}labmed.cmht.nwest.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. Basu, H. Tang, C. E. Lewis, K. North, J. D. Curb, T. Quertermous, T. H. Mosley, E. Boerwinkle, X. Zhu, and N. J. Risch
Admixture mapping of quantitative trait loci for blood lipids in African-Americans
Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2009; 18(11): 2091 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.