Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaukinen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kaukinen, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2002; 95: 75-77
© 2002 Association of Physicians

The hunt for coeliac disease in primary care

P. Collin1,, M. Rasmussen3, S. Kyrönpalo3, P. Laippala2 and K. Kaukinen1

1 From the Department of Internal Medicine and 2 Research Unit, Tampere University Hospital, and 1Medical School and 2Public Health School, University of Tampere, and 3 Tampere Health Centre, Tampere, Finland

Received 9 May 2001 and in revised form 16 November 2001

Background: Serological screening suggests that most coeliac disease goes undetected.

Aim: To determine how often coeliac disease is found in patients referred for gastroscopy by general practitioners.

Design: Testing of 9971 consecutive patients referred to a single health centre for their first open-access gastroscopy over a 10-year period, without previously-diagnosed coeliac disease or dermatitis herpetiformis.

Methods: Endoscopy and routine duodenal biopsy were in use throughout the study period. The occurrence of coeliac disease was evaluated in patients with dyspepsia, in those with regurgitation, and in those with symptoms suggestive of coeliac disease.

Results: Altogether, 147 (1.47%) patients had coeliac disease: 18/2974 (0.61%) with regurgitation, 41/5347 (0.77%) with dyspepsia, and 88/1650 (5.33%) with suspected coeliac disease. Increasing age reduced the risk very slightly (OR 0.98; 95%CI 0.97–0.99). Risk was significantly increased when there was a suspicion of coeliac disease (OR 9.085; 95%CI 5.371–15.369), while no difference was found between patients with dyspepsia and those with reflux disease (OR 1.33; 95%CI 0.75–2.34). The risk in women was not increased (OR 0.97; 95%CI 0.69–1.38).

Discussion: In this primary-care setting, <1% of patients with upper abdominal symptoms suffered from coeliac disease; population-based serological screening is expected to yield a corresponding prevalence. When physicians had suspected coeliac disease, the condition was nine times more common.

Address correspondence to Dr P. Collin, Medical School, FIN 33014 University of Tampere, Finland. e–mail: pekka.collin{at}uta.fi


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
A. D Hopper, S. S Cross, D. P Hurlstone, M. E McAlindon, A. J Lobo, M. Hadjivassiliou, M. E Sloan, S. Dixon, and D. S Sanders
Pre-endoscopy serological testing for coeliac disease: evaluation of a clinical decision tool
BMJ, April 7, 2007; 334(7596): 729 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
G. R. Locke III, J. A. Murray, A. R. Zinsmeister, L. J. Melton III, and N. J. Talley
Celiac Disease Serology in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Dyspepsia: A Population-Based Case-Control Study
Mayo Clin. Proc., April 1, 2004; 79(4): 476 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.