Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkinson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hopkinson, N.
Right arrow Articles by Benjamin, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2001; 94: 465-470
© 2001 Association of Physicians

A case ascertainment study of septic discitis: clinical, microbiological and radiological features

N. Hopkinson, J. Stevenson1 and S. Benjamin

From the Departments of Rheumatology and 1 Radiology, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Bournemouth, UK

Received 18 May 2001 and in revised form 4 June 2001

We studied the spectrum of septic discitis presenting to two busy district general hospitals over 2.5 years (November 1996 to April 1999), surveying the case notes of all patients attending Royal Bournemouth and Poole Hospitals with probable septic discitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-two cases of septic discitis were identified, suggesting an annual incidence of 2/100 000/year. Seventy-three percent of patients were aged >=65 years. In 91% of patients, back pain was the presenting symptom, with neurological signs evident in 45% of patients. Fever >37.5 °C was present in 68% of patients, and a marked elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in 91%. Diagnosis was originally by MRI in 86% of patients, with plain radiographs not diagnostic of discitis in the early stages of the infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest pathogen (41%), but in 18% of patients, no organism was identified. The major predisposing factors to septic discitis were invasive procedures (41%), underlying cancer (25%) and diabetes (18%). Pre-existing degenerative spinal disease was found in 50% of patients. Four patients whose causative organism was not isolated had a poorer outcome: one death and three with increased morbidity. Our estimated incidence rate (2/100 000/year) is higher than that in previous studies and may be due to a higher detection rate with MRI and/or a genuine increase in the number of cases. Septic discitis should be considered in any patient who has severe localized pain at any spinal level, especially if accompanied by fever and elevated ESR, or in the immunosuppressed.

Address correspondence to Dr N. Hopkinson, Department of Rheumatology, Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth BH7 7DW


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
D A Enoch, J S Cargill, R Laing, S Herbert, T W Corrah, and N M Brown
Value of CT-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of septic discitis
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 61(6): 750 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. C. A. Michel, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, N. Boos, and J. Hodler
CT-Guided Core Biopsy of Subchondral Bone and Intervertebral Space in Suspected Spondylodiskitis.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 977 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
M. Hatton, M. Gupta, P. Balint, and M. Field
Septic discitis presenting following intravenous cannulation
QJM, March 1, 2002; 95(3): 189 - 191.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.