| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q J Med 2001; 94: 235-236
© 2001 Association of Physicians
Editorial |
Consultant appraisal
Oxford Kidney Unit, The Churchill, The Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford
Consultant appraisal will be an annual contractual requirement from April 2001. Not only will it be part of the GMC revalidation process, but refusal to participate will be a disciplinary matter that renders the individual ineligible for Discretionary Points or a Distinction Award. There will be no exceptions, so all consultants had better know about it.
Why, after more than 50 years of the NHS, has this requirement now emerged? First, there is now no longer automatic acceptance that all consultants are satisfactory. As the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf said, the automatic assumption of beneficence has been dented.1 Most consultants are competent and beneficent most of the
References
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Shaw, C. K. Cassel, C. Black, and W. Levinson Shared Medical Regulation in a Time of Increasing Calls for Accountability and Transparency: Comparison of Recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom JAMA, November 11, 2009; 302(18): 2008 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.J. Webb and C.G. Winearls Consultant appraisal: serving two masters QJM, November 1, 2001; 94(11): 657 - 657. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

