Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alp, N.J.
Right arrow Articles by Shahi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alp, N.J.
Right arrow Articles by Shahi, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2001; 94: 687-694
© 2001 Association of Physicians

A rapid troponin-I-based protocol for assessing acute chest pain

N.J. Alp, J.A. Bell1 and M. Shahi1

From the Cardiology Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, and 1 Cardiology Department, Royal Berkshire and Battle Hospitals, Reading, UK

Received 21 March 2001 and in revised form 27 September 2001

In a prospective randomized open trial with 30-day follow-up, we compared a troponin-I-based protocol to ‘standard management’ for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with acute non-ST-elevation chest pain. Patients with acute chest pain (n=400) were randomized to standard diagnostic tests and management, or a protocol based on the admission ECG and the troponin-I result 6 h after onset of chest pain. Low-risk patients were discharged early from CCU; high-risk patients were treated with medical therapy or referred for in-patient angiography as appropriate. We measured length of CCU stay, and followed all patients for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), or urgent revascularization during the admission and for 30 days post-discharge. The troponin protocol allowed earlier discharge in the low-risk group (10 vs. 30 h, p<0.001) with no excess of adverse events compared to standard management (3% vs. 5%, p=0.32). It identified a group of patients at moderate risk of cardiac events (15% MACE rate during admission and 30-day follow-up), and a high-risk group (75% MACE rate) more accurately than did standard management. The prognostic power of troponin testing in combination with the admission ECG was higher than with either test used alone. The protocol improved the efficiency of low-risk patient management, and improved patient risk stratification. This study adds to the evidence favouring troponin evaluation as part of the management of acute coronary syndromes.

Address correspondence to Dr N.J. Alp, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX37BN. e-mail: nicholas.alp{at}well.ox.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.