Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lip, G.Y.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lip, G.Y.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2001; 94: 609-614
© 2001 Association of Physicians

Managing atrial fibrillation in the Accident and Emergency department

E. Williams1,2, M. Ansari2 and G.Y.H. Lip1,

1 From the University Department of Medicine and 2 Accident & Emergency Department, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK

Received 5 September 2001 We surveyed Accident and Emergency (A&E) consultants in England by questionnaire, on their management of patients presenting with AF. Completed questionnaires were received from 124 (45%). Most (42%) would use digoxin as first-line treatment for rate control of AF; 28% would not treat AF acutely but would refer the patient to the medical team; 59% would cardiovert a patient with AF in A&E, if there was evidence of cardiovascular compromise. Some 51% would not routinely initiate any anticoagulation therapy. Faced with a patient in fast AF who was haemodynamically unstable, 67% would immediately opt for electrical cardioversion, 13% would refer the patient directly to the medics and 15% would initially treat with intravenous digoxin. Given a patient in fast AF and cardiac failure, 55% would treat with digoxin. Asked about AF related to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, 37% would initially give adenosine, 23% would opt for immediate DC cardioversion and 25% would refer directly to the medics; however, a minority would still give a rate-limiting calcium antagonist or digoxin. The majority (79%) would not treat AF in a known alcoholic with acute intoxication who was haemodynamically stable. Consultants were more likely to initiate treatment if the patient had signs of shock or heart failure. Where there were underlying medical problems they were more likely to refer the patient directly to the medical team. There was a general reluctance to initiate anticoagulation, and some difference in opinion over how long AF should have persisted for anticoagulation to be necessary in the context of electrical cardioversion. Given the current evolution of A&E as an acute speciality, A&E clinicians should at least initiate management of patients with AF and be prepared to care for them for some time in A&E.

Address correspondence to Professor G.Y.H. Lip, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH. e-mail: g.y.h.lip{at}bham.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A Choudhury and G Y H Lip
How good is anticoagulation control in non-valvar atrial fibrillation? Observations on the elderly, ethnicity, patient perceptions, and understanding of AF thromboprophylaxis
Heart, April 1, 2005; 91(4): 425 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Garcia, F. Marin, B. Sanchez, V. Roldan, P. Marco, G.Y.H. Lip, K.H. Tan, C. Lau, and E. Williams
Diurnal Variation in the Intensity of Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke, January 1, 2002; 33(1): 322 - 324.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.