Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayou, R.A.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayou, R.A.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2000; 93: 805-811
© 2000 Association of Physicians

Can clinical assessment of chest pain be made more therapeutic?

R.A. Mayou, C. Bass1, G. Hart2, S. Tyndel and B. Bryant

From the University Dept of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford 1 Department of Psychological Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, and 2 Department of Medicine, Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK

Received 20 June 2000 and in revised form 13 September 2000

We describe the referral and management of consecutive patients attending a cardiac service with the presenting complaint of chest pain. Of 610 consecutive new referrals to five Oxford cardiac clinics over 12 weeks, 202 had chest pain as the presenting complaint: 91 (45%) angina, 101 (50%) non-cardiac chest pain, 8 (4%) both and 2 (1%) uncertain diagnosis. Information in clinic letters was sometimes ambiguous and contradictory and suggested a lack of precise information to patients. Patients with non-cardiac chest pain often had long histories, including considerable previous use of services and specialist investigations. There were delays in referral and assessment of patients. There are opportunities for simple changes in assessment procedures which might have substantial advantages for outcome and resource: (i) more detailed referral information from general practitioners, with an explicit statement of the reasons for referral; (ii) minor modifications to augment the assessment by provision of unambiguous information to patients and primary care at discharge.

Address correspondence to Professor R.A. Mayou, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX7 3JX. e-mail: richard.mayou{at}psych.ox.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
P. Tyrer
From the Editor's desk
The British Journal of Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 194(6): 578 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
G. Nijher, J. Weinman, C. Bass, and J. Chambers
Chest pain in people with normal coronary anatomy
BMJ, December 8, 2001; 323(7325): 1319 - 1320.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.