Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Shaughnessy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wimperis, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Shaughnessy, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wimperis, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2000; 93: 663-667
© 2000 Association of Physicians

UK patients with deep-vein thrombosis can be safely treated as out-patients

D. O'Shaughnessy, J. Miles1 and J. Wimperis2

From the Department of Haematology, St Peter's Hospital, Chertsey 1 Department of General Medicine, North Manchester General Hospital, Crumpsall 2 Department of Haematology, Norfolk and Norwich General Hospital, Norwich, UK

Received 12 March 2000 and in revised form 9 August 2000

Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) affects ~1:1000 people, ~750 cases/year in a Health Authority of average size. Prior to 1992, patients presenting with DVT were usually admitted for treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) over a 5-day period, but pressures on medical admissions have prompted many hospitals to review conditions which could be managed at home. Three different pilot studies commenced in 1996 at three centres in the UK. After 6 months, the protocols used were integrated into the normal care plan of the hospital. In total, 5191 patients were assessed, of whom 1347 were either venogram or dopples ultrasound positive. Overall 1138 (82%) were treated as out-patients, 75% presenting during ‘working hours’. Only 12 patients were readmitted, one with a clinically significant PE. Success was attributed to three factors: assignment of a key person as the project co-ordinator; referral of patients directly to permanent, dedicated staff, either on the Medical Admissions Unit (MAU) or the Accident and Emergency (A&E) department; and the introduction of dedicated anticoagulation nurses. In the 6-month period following initial therapy, complications were well below those in previously published studies. Most patients with DVT in the UK can be treated safely and effectively without being admitted to hospital.

Address correspondence to Dr D. O'Shaughnessy, Department of Haematology, C Level, Mail Point 008, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD. e-mail: kcb07{at}dial.pipex.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 QJMHome page
P. Collin, K. Pietila, and J. Lahtela
Costs of treating deep-vein thrombosis
QJM, May 1, 2001; 94(5): 284 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.