Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bardhan, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Royston, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bardhan, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Royston, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

QJM, Vol 91, Issue 3 231-237, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL PAPERS

The outcome of bleeding duodenal ulcer in the era of H2 receptor antagonist therapy

KD Bardhan, AK Nayyar and C Royston
Rotherham General Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

We studied 2119 patients presenting with duodenal ulcer as sole lesion, in the period 1976-1993, the era of H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) therapy, prior to the introduction of Helicobacter pylori eradication. We used clinical assessment and serial check endoscopy to investigate the incidence of bleeding at presentation (group I, n = 286, 13.5%), the long-term outcome in this group and in that presenting with pain alone (group II, n = 1833, 87%) with respect to ulcer recurrence and bleeding, and the effect of H2RA maintenance therapy. Most patients were treated with H2RA, principally cimetidine. In group I, seven patients died early on; 38 had urgent surgery, of whom six died post- operatively. The remainder were treated; five immediately re-bled, of whom three were operated on. On follow-up, 98/227 group I patients relapsed, 21 (21%) of whom rebled. Relapse in group II was 1017/1668, with only 42 (4%) bleeding (p < 0.001). In patients without maintenance treatment, relapse was markedly higher (50/78 group I, 529/742 group II), but group II still bled significantly less (20% group I vs. 3% group II). Relapse on maintenance was: 48/149 with five (10%) rebleeding in group I, and 488/926 with five (1%) bleeding in group II (p < 0.001). Despite the introduction of H2RA therapy, patients presenting with haemorrhage still have a risk of bleeding at ulcer relapse about 7-fold higher than that for those presenting with pain alone.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.