Skip Navigation

QJM 2008 101(9):673-674; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn103
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bannon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bannon, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Elements: In this month's issue

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The subject of impact factor (IF) continues to attract significant controversy and debate. Those opposed to the use of IF as a measure of a journal's; worth argue that it is calculated on a highly technical and complicated basis. This calculation does not necessarily take quality into account but then again how does one define quality in this . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Michael Bannon, Editor, QJM


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?