Skip Navigation

QJM 2007 100(12):791-797; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcm114
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Workman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Workman, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A communication model for encouraging optimal care at the end of life for hospitalized patients

S. Workman

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada

Address correspondence to Assistant Professor Stephen Workman, Room 437 Bethune Building, QEII HSC, Halifax Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada. email: sworkman{at}dal.ca


   Abstract

Multiple studies have demonstrated that treatment at or near the end of life is rarely optimal. Unwanted death-prolonging treatments are frequently provided and open communication about death and dying is often lacking. Early effective communication about goals, prognosis and options would improve patient care at or near the end of life by enhancing choice and facilitating palliative care. A five-step sequential approach to communicating with patients at risk of dying in hospital about treatment goals and outcomes (and/or their family members) is presented. The five steps are founded upon the recognition that trials of life-sustaining treatments are also, by definition, trials of palliative care. A narrative review of currently available qualitative and quantitative research is used to support the recommendations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.