Skip Navigation

QJM 2006 99(12):881-882; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcl126
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, M.L.
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, K.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, M.L.
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, K.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Response

M.L. Halperin and K.S. Kamel

Division of Nephrology
St Michael's Hospital
University of Toronto
Toronto
ON, Canada

Sir,

We thank Dr Rosival for his interesting comments. It is true that important authorities, such as those he cited, do state that a low pH in arterial blood can lead to a decreased level of consciousness. Nevertheless, one must ask: ‘What is the compelling evidence to believe that this is ‘cause-and-effect’, rather than an association’. Paraphrasing Beveridge,1 one can never prove anything to be correct experimentally. Rather the scientific principle is that one ‘flawless’ experiment with an ‘ugly fact’ will disprove a ‘beautiful hypothesis’, even if the association is observed in many situations’. In this context, since the blood pH can fall below 7.0 during a sprint2 while there is no obvious ‘deterioration in CNS status’, these data are not consistent with a direct linkage between a decreased level of consciousness and a very low blood pH.

Our impression is that a decrease in CNS function may be seen when metabolic acidosis is accompanied by a low ECF volume with poor haemodynamics.3 The essence of the argument is as follows. While it may seem obvious that the severity of the metabolic acidosis (indicated by how low the concentration of Formula in plasma was) is the most important determinant of the H+ load to be removed by the brain, the novel features of the bicarbonate buffer system described in reference 3 prompts us now to think otherwise.

Our view is that the expected physiological response to a large H+ load is to have H+ removed by the bicarbonate buffer system;4 this requires a low pCO2 in capillaries in the location where most of the bicarbonate buffer system exists (in the interstitial fluid and in cells of skeletal muscle). If this capillary pCO2 rises unduly due to a slow blood flow rate in response to the contracted ECF volume, the majority of Formula in the body is not available to remove most of these new H+. Hence the brain will be presented with a much higher H+ load. If, in addition, the haemodynamic state is compromised sufficiently to undermine the autoregulated cerebral blood flow rate, the pCO2 in capillaries at the blood–brain barrier should rise and this will divert H+ from the bicarbonate buffer system in brain cells. The resulting high intracellular H+ concentration will force more H+ to bind to intracellular proteins, which will change their charge and perhaps, their shape and function, with potentially devastating results.

Infusing enough isotonic saline to improve the blood flow to skeletal muscles is perhaps the most effective way to ensure that buffering by the bicarbonate buffer system in the interstitial fluid and in cells of skeletal muscles has improved; this is indicated by a fall in the brachial venous pCO2. As a result, fewer H+ will bind to proteins in brain cells, and their ‘ideal charge’ should be restored.5 On the other hand, a low arterial pCO2 is necessary, but not sufficient for this ideal, non-cerebral, buffering of H+.

References

1. Beveridge WIB. (1951) Art of Scientific investigation Penguin Books.

2. Cheetham M, Boobis L, Brooks S, Williams C. (1986) Human muscle metabolism during sprint running. J Appl Physiol 61 54–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Halperin ML, Kamel KS, Maccari C, Carlotti ACP, Bohn D. (2006) Strategies to reduce the danger of cerebral edema in a pediatric patient with diabetic ketoacidosis. Ped Diabetes 7 191–5.[CrossRef]

4. Vasuvattakul S, Warner LC, Halperin ML. (1992) Quantitative role of the intracellular bicarbonate buffer system in response to an acute acid load. Am J Physiol 262 R305–9.[Medline]

5. Zalunardo N, Lemaire M, Davids MR, Halperin ML. (2004) Acidosis in a patient with cholera: A need to redefine concepts. Q J Med 97 681–96.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, M.L.
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, K.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, M.L.
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, K.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?