QJM Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2005
QJM 2005 98(5):357-364; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci057
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: clinical characteristics of dizzy patients referred to a Falls and Syncope Unit
From the 1Falls and Syncope Service, Care of the Elderly Offices, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, 2Regional ENT Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, and 3Department of Neurootology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
Address correspondence to Dr J.L. Newton, Falls and Syncope Service, Care of the Elderly Offices, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle NE1 4LP. e-mail: julia.newton{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk
Received 29 September 2004 and in revised form 21 January 2005
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: Dizziness is a common symptom in older people that affects quality of life and increases the risk of falls. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common cause of dizziness that increases in prevalence with age, and is potentially curable.
Aim: To compare patients with BPPV referred initially to a Falls and Syncope Unit (FSS group) with those initially referred to a Regional ENT/Balance Service (ENT group).
Design: Retrospective case-note review.
Methods: Medical notes, investigations and outcomes were reviewed for all patients.
Results: Of 59 patients with BPPV confirmed by Dix-Hallpike test, 31 (53%) were initially referred to the FSS (2.6 patients per month, 71% females) and 28 (47%) were initially referred to ENT (4.7 patients per month, 86% females). Compared to those referred initially to ENT, FSS patients were significantly older (mean ± SD 69 ± 13 vs. 55.4 ± 13 years, p = 0.0003) and had dizzy symptoms for longer before diagnosis (median (range) 12 (4120) vs. 6 (136) months, p = 0.0273). FSS patients were more likely to have more than one type of dizziness (16% vs. 0%, p = 0.001), more likely to have cerebrovascular or cardiovascular co-morbidity (13% vs. 4%, p = 0.0152) and were taking significantly more medications (3.2 vs. 1.7; p = 0.0271). Cure rates on intervention were similar (83% FSS, 86% ENT).
Discussion: BPPV is a potentially curable cause for dizziness in older people. Older people are frequently referred directly to Falls units, who will be seeing increasing numbers of patients with dizziness. A high index of suspicion allows early identification and treatment of this condition.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dizziness is one of the commonest symptoms described by older people,1 and is associated with balance disorders, functional decline and falls.24
Determining the exact aetiology of dizziness in older people is frequently difficult because of comorbidity and age-related changes within the cardiovascular, neurological and vestibular systems. Furthermore, a consultation for dizziness in an older person can be frustrating for the clinician, because the description of dizziness may be non-specific and there may be a lack of specific physical findings. This frustration has been compounded by the misconception that dizziness in older people is untreatable and regarded as a part of normal ageing.
At least 50% of all older people with dizziness complain of two different types of dizzy symptoms.4 The most common is a gait disorder (a feeling of disequilibrium on walking),5 but they may also have symptoms arising from the cardiovascular and peripheral vestibular systems. Although some causes of dizziness represent a life-threatening condition,6 most are benign and self-limiting.
Positional vertigo (vertigo provoked by changes in head position) is one of the most common neuro-otological symptoms. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) accounts for the great majority of cases caused by peripheral vestibular rather than central pathology. BPPV is thought to result from malfunction of the posterior semicircular canal, with the canal becoming sensitive to gravity or linear acceleration. This is thought to arise because of debris that becomes free-floating in the endolymph. As a result, head movement may cause loose particles to move within the posterior semicircular canal.7,8 The diagnosis of posterior canal BPPV is made when typical signs (nystagmus) and symptoms (vertigo and nausea) are provoked by positional tests such as the Dix-Hallpike test.7,8 With appropriate intervention (e.g. the Epley repositioning manoeuvre), 8090% of patients with BPPV will be cured.9
The prevalence of BPPV increases with age,10 and in older people is associated with falls, reduced activities of daily living and depression.11 As a result benign may be an inappropriate description in this context, as BPPV can be a severe and disabling condition.7,8 One study has suggested a prevalence of unrecognized BPPV of 9% in older people attending a medical out-patient clinic for other reasons.11
Older people complaining of dizziness may be referred to a variety of specialities. From our own experience there is a clear rise in referrals with dizziness alone to geriatricians, particularly to Falls and Syncope Units. Most previous studies of BPPV have come from a select group of patients that have been referred to an Otolaryngologist or ENT department after reporting dizziness.
The aim of this study was to (a) identify the prevalence of BPPV in patients initially referred to a Falls and Syncope Unit (FSS), (b) identify the clinical characteristics and additional co-morbidity of these patients, and (c) compare and contrast the clinical characteristics and comorbidity of these patients to patients who were referred directly to the ENT service of the same area.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects referred directly to the FSS
The Falls and Syncope Service (FSS) based at the Royal Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle is the largest facility of its kind in Europe. Each year, 1500 new patients are seen in the unit, of whom 500 (33%) describe either dizziness alone, or dizziness in addition to falls and or syncope.
We identified consecutive patients referred by General Practitioners to the FSS between December 2002 and December 2003, in whom a diagnosis of posterior canal BPPV was made. In all new patients attending our unit, consistency of history-taking is ensured by the use of a standardized proforma. In patients complaining of positional dizziness, performing diagnostic testing for BPPV is mandatory.
When a diagnosis of BPPV was made in the FSS at the time of this study, all patients were then referred to the same ENT surgeon (IJ) at the Balance Centre located in the ENT department in the same city but on a different site, to confirm the diagnosis of BPPV. This group will be referred to as the FSS group.
Patients referred directly to ENT
Using the same diagnostic criteria, a series of consecutive patients with posterior canal BPPV, who had been referred by General Practitioners directly to the same ENT surgeon (IJ), who runs the Newcastle Balance Centre, were identified during the 6-month period between June 2003 and December 2003. Symptoms are reviewed in patients attending the Balance Centre in a similar structured way as in the FSS but examination and investigations are directed to vestibular disorders only. This group will be referred to as the ENT group.
Diagnosis and management of BPPV
A diagnosis of BPPV was made on the basis of typical signs (nystagmus) and symptoms (vertigo and nausea) provoked by the Dix-Hallpike test.9 All patients had the typical nystagmus expected with posterior canal BPPV i.e torsional-vertical geotrophic nystagmus, with latency and typical duration.
If patients were still symptomatic and continued to have typical symptoms on Hallpike testing at consultation with the ENT surgeon, the care pathway in our area at the time of this study was that they were referred for appropriate re-positioning manoeuvres performed by a suitably trained Audiology Physician. The Epley manoeuvre for treating right posterior canal BPPV is shown in Figure 1. Where the Epley was felt to be inappropriate, the use of other repositioning techniques such as Brandt Daroff exercises and the Semont manoeuvre was recorded. Cure was defined for the purposes of this study as asymptomatic at clinic review.
|
Data collected and statistics
General Practitioner (GP) referral letters and the subsequent findings at both the FSS and ENT clinic were reviewed retrospectively by one observer. Data collected included age, sex, types of dizziness, working diagnosis as described by GP and a detailed description of dizziness and comorbidity obtained in the FSS and ENT clinic (dizziness on head movement, postural change, turning in bed, duration of dizziness, number of falls in the last 12 months, past medical history, additional cerebrovascular and cardiovascular morbidity, medications taken by the patient, history of head trauma, inner ear disease, or migraine).
Data are expressed as means ± SD (parametric) or medians (range) (non-parametric). Comparisons were drawn between groups by students' t test (parametric) or Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric), as appropriate. Proportions were compared using
2 test and Fisher's test, as appropriate. A statistically significant result was taken as p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical characteristics of those with BPPV (Table 1)
In total, 59 patients with a diagnosis of BPPV confirmed by Dix-Hallpike test were identified. Of these, 31 (53%) had been initially referred by their General Practitioner to the FSS during the 12-month period, equating to 2.6 patients per month. Of these 31, 22 were females (71%). In the same 12-month period, the unit saw approximately 500 patients referred by General Practitioners who complained of dizzy symptoms; the prevalence of BPPV in subjects referred to our Falls and Syncope Unit with dizzy symptoms was thus 6.2%.
|
Twenty-eight patients with BPPV were initially referred to ENT (47%) during the 6-month study period; 24 (86%) were female and, as would be expected, the referral rates were higher to ENT (4.7 patients per month).
Comparing the characteristics of groups referred initially by GPs to FSS (n = 31) and ENT (n = 28), those referred initially to the FSS were older (mean ± SD age 69 ± 13 vs. 55.4 ± 13 years; p = 0.0003), and had dizzy symptoms for longer before diagnosis (median (range) 12 (4120) vs. 6 (136) months; p = 0.0273). Those referred to the FSS were more likely to have more than one type of dizziness from the GP referral letter (16% vs. 0%; p = 0.001), more likely to have cerebrovascular or cardiovascular co-morbidity (13% vs. 4%; p = 0.0152) and were taking significantly more medications (3.2 vs. 1.7; p = 0.0271).
Symptom description in those referred directly to FSS was less classical for a diagnosis of BPPVi.e. patients were significantly more likely to describe dizziness with postural change (40% vs. 14%; p = 0.044) and less likely to describe vertigo (40% vs. 89%; p = 0.0001). Those referred to FSS were significantly more likely to have also experienced falls (p = 0.0112). Following assessment at the FSS, 45% had more than one type of dizziness and 26% had an additional cardiovascular type of dizziness. In the group referred direct to ENT, no additional types of dizziness were identified by the ENT department. In the group referred to ENT, the GP made a provisional diagnosis of BPPV in 25% and clearly described positional vertigo in a further 25% in the referral letter. No GP made a provisional diagnosis of BPPV or positional vertigo in the group referred to FSS.
The effect of intervention upon outcome
Reassuringly, 100% of the diagnoses of BPPV were confirmed either on history or in symptomatic patients, with repeat Hallpike, when the patient was seen in the ENT clinic. Whilst waiting for ENT review, three (10%) of the FSS patients recovered without intervention. Epley was possible in 22 of the 25 patients (88%) referred from the FSS who remained symptomatic and who had a positive Hallpike test. Eighty-three percent were cured by intervention if initially referred to FSS; this was not significantly different from the 86% cure rate if referred directly to ENT (Table 2).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have described the characteristics of patients presenting to a Falls unit with BPPV, a common and potentially curable cause of dizziness. Considering the number of older people found to have BPPV and referred by their General Practitioner to a Falls unit rather than directly to an ENT department, we would suggest our study highlights this as an important diagnosis for physicians to consider when seeing older people with dizziness.
In our study, patients found to have BPPV and describing postural symptoms were more likely to be referred to a Falls clinic managed by geriatricians, while patients complaining of vertigo were referred to an ENT service. When presented with older patients with dizzy symptoms, maintaining a high index of suspicion is important, as making a diagnosis of BPPV in older people may be more difficult, particularly as this group frequently have more than one type of dizziness, may describe postural dizzy symptoms (raising the suspicion of orthostatic hypotension), and may have multiple co-morbidity and coexistent cardiovascular diagnoses.
Although this is a relatively small series of patients, we have confirmed that a trained and motivated team of geriatricians working in a Falls clinic can diagnose BPPV successfully in what might be considered to be a difficult group. We suggest that training geriatricians in repositioning manoeuvres could further improve management of these patients, and avoid delays before what is known to be an extremely effective intervention. In addition, we would suggest that ENT services may not be considering what may be a high prevalence of co-morbidity in older patients with BPPV. The presence of medical co-morbidity adversely affects overall improvement of dizzy symptoms in other vestibular conditions,12 and identifying and managing other medical pathologies is an integral part of effective rehabilitation.
With intervention, comparable numbers of those with BPPV were cured. Irrespective of the initial referral route, although referral to a Falls clinic (in our locality) probably delayed that intervention. Despite this, there are some potential benefits in initial referral to a Falls clinic, as this does allow a multidisciplinary comprehensive assessment, with identification and treatment of other causes of dizziness (most particularly cardiovascular diagnoses). It is important that evidence-based care pathways are established to ensure equity of access for all patients with BPPV to suitably trained experts, particularly for particle re-positioning manoeuvres, investigations such as audiograms, and vestibular rehabilitation exercises.13 These facilities could be provided in a Falls clinic environment with close links to an ENT/Balance centre, where repeated physical manoeuvres (rather than single manoeuvres) and self-treatment programmes that have been shown to be superior might also be done.14,15
We would suggest that services for dizzy patients should allow for efficient, seamless movement between Falls clinics run by geriatricians and a Balance/Vertigo service run by ENT or Audiological Physicians, and that joint working to optimize management in this difficult group may be the path to future progress.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Sloane P, Blazer D, George LK. Dizziness in a community elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37:1018.[Web of Science][Medline]
2. Boult C, Murphy J, Sloane P, et al. The relation of dizziness to functional decline. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39:85861.[Web of Science][Medline]
3. Sloane PD, Baloh RW. Persistent dizziness in geriatric patients J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37:10318.
4. Baloh RW. Dizziness in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40:71321.[Web of Science][Medline]
5. Tinetti ME, Williams CS, Gill TM. Dizziness among older adults: a possible geriatric syndrome. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:33744.
6. Froehling D, Silverstein M, Mohr D, Beatty C. Does this dizzy patient have a serious form of vertigo? JAMA 1994; 271:3859.
7. Furman JM. Cass SP. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:15906.
8. Parnes LS, Agrawal SK. Atlas J. Diagnosis and management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). CMAJ 2003; 169:68193.
9. Hilton M, Pinder D. The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (2):CD003162.
10. Katsarkas A, Kirkham TH. Paroxysmal positionsal vertigoa study of 255 cases. J Otolaryngol 1978; 7:32030.[Web of Science][Medline]
11. Oghalai J, Manolidis S, Barth J, Stewart M, Jenkins H. Unrecognised benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in elderly patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122:6304.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
12. Gillespie MB, Minor LB. Prognosis in bilateral vestibular hypofunction. Laryngoscope 1999; 109:3541.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
13. Angeli SI. Hawley R. Gomez O. Systematic approach to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in the elderly. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128:71925.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Radtke A, von Brevern M, Tiel-Wilck K, Mainz-Perchalla A, Neuhauser H, Lempert T. Self-treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Semont maneuver vs Epley procedure. Neurology 2004; 63:1502.
15. Gordon CR, Gadoth N. Repeated vs single physical maneuver in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110: 1669.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Lawson, D.-E. Bamiou, H. S. Cohen, and J. Newton Positional vertigo in a falls service Age Ageing, September 1, 2008; 37(5): 585 - 588. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Newman-Toker, L. M. Cannon, M. E. Stofferahn, R. E. Rothman, Y.-H. Hsieh, and D. S. Zee Imprecision in Patient Reports of Dizziness Symptom Quality: A Cross-sectional Study Conducted in an Acute Care Setting Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2007; 82(11): 1329 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






