Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, A.K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, A.K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2003; 96: 379-380
© 2003 Association of Physicians


Correspondence

The head-up tilt test for diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome

A.K. Ghosh and K. Ghosh

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA e-mail: ghosh.amit{at}mayo.edu

Sir,

The recent paper by Naschitz et al.1 on the use of the head-up tilt test with haemodynamic instability score (HIS) in the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) provides additional insight about the role of dysautonomia in the pathogenesis of CFS. We would like to raise some points regarding the patient group studied.

The enrolment of clinically-diagnosed CFS patients and the awareness of diagnosis by technicians prior to performing the tilt test, could result in selection bias. Additionally, generalizing the result of the study, whose population was rich in patients with CFS (40/349, or 11%) to the general population (prevalence of CFS 0.07–0.2%) could be misleading. Using their results of a sensitivity of 90.3% and specificity of 84.5% for a cutoff of HIS >-0.98, a positive head-up tilt test in a patient presenting with fatigue in the general population would have a positive predictive value of only 0.37–1.15. This result, taken with the fact that around one-fifth of the patients developed a presyncopal or syncopal episode, would make the test less appealing to patients. However, in a patient presenting with fatigue where clinical diagnosis remained unclear despite lengthy evaluation, the head-up tilt test could be useful for narrowing down the range of diagnoses.

References

1. Naschitz JE, Rosner I, Rozenbaum M, et al. The head-up tilt test with haemodynamic instability score in diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome. Q J Med 2003; 96:133–42.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, A.K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, A.K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?