Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on June 10, 2009
QJM 2009 102(8):585-586; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/8/585    most recent
hcp069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCarroon, M.O.
Right arrow Articles by McCarron, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCarroon, M.O.
Right arrow Articles by McCarron, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

European Working Time Directive in a stroke unit: hidden deficits

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Sir,

The study by Cappucio et al.1 argues that the 48-h working limit per week can improve patient safety when the range of the working week period is reduced. Their data have been criticized, in part because of the casemix variation between the traditional and intervention arms of the study . . . [Full Text of this Article]

M.O. McCarroon and M. Armstrong

Acute Stroke Unit Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry Northern Ireland, BT47 6SB, UK

P. McCarron

St John of God Hospital Dublin, Ireland

e-mail: markmccarron@doctors.org.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?