Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martyn, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martyn, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2003; 96: 243-244
© 2003 Association of Physicians

Editorial

Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism

Christopher Martyn

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

‘Many people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character’—Albert Einstein

The Office of Research Integrity of the USA (ORI) issued its annual report for 2001 at the end of last year. It is available on the Internet at [http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/publications/annual-reports.asp], and anyone interested in standards of scientific conduct, a category that should include practising physicians and biomedical researchers, will find it worth reading and thinking about. The title of this editorial comes from their definition of scientific misconduct: an action that represents fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or other practices that seriously deviate from those commonly . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?