Q J Med 2000; 93: 121-124
© 2000 Association of Physicians
Confidence limits and the limits of confidence
F. Kee
From the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
Address correspondence to Professor F. Kee, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, The Queen's University of Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Rd, Belfast, BT12 6BJ. e-mail:f.kee@qub.ac.uk
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Someone once said that what goes up, must come down, but this
never seems to be the case with workload. While most busy clinicians
have been doing their best to keep their heads above water,
others have been temporarily distracted by the many column inches
devoted to whether or not
Evidence-Based Medicine represents
a new paradigm for their clinical practice. At times the debate
has verged on the bilious, each side attempting to claim the
high ground of authority, either by dint of training or experience.
The view from one camp, for example, is that ... the
difficulty with evidence based medicine lies with its exponentstheir
arrogance, their jargon and their penchant for denigrating others.
1 At its more extreme, statisticians should not evaluate clinical
data, full stop. Witness the correspondence in the
BMJ of September
26th 1998: ... We believe that the paper by the Cochrane
injuries Group
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
Confidence limits
|
|---|
 |
The limits of confidence
|
|---|
 |
References
|
|---|

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?