Skip Navigation

QJM 2009 102(7):441-442; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp086
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bannon, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bannon, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Elements: In this month's issue

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

As editor I have noted the relatively large number of submitted papers that do not properly belong to the category of "primary research" but which might be more appropriately classified as representing descriptions of clinical audits. In general, these papers describe a situation where there is an agreed method of treatment for a disease or disorder and the authors evaluate adherence by clinical teams to established protocols. The paper by Cunnington et al.is . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Michael Bannon

Editor, QJM


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?