Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on March 31, 2009
QJM 2009 102(11):827-828; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp034
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/11/827    most recent
hcp034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seaton, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seaton, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Oh no—it's Donald Hunter!

Anthony Seaton

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Once upon a time the MRCP (London) was divided, like Gaul, into three parts: the compulsory essay questions and clinicals; the path viva (not confined to pathology); and the final viva before the President, Censors and senior examiners. Each step weeded out the majority, leaving a very nervous ~10% for the final ordeal. And in the path viva there was the risk of meeting Donald Hunter. I only saw him once, as a student, when he came to give an invited lecture at our medical school; he was a big man and spoke impressively on the history of occupational diseases. His book on the subject became . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?