Skip Navigation

QJM 2006 99(6):377-388; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcl051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodacre, S.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodacre, S.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown Copyright 2006. Reproduced by permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office.

How should we diagnose suspected deep-vein thrombosis?

S. Goodacre1,, M. Stevenson2, A. Wailoo2, F. Sampson1, A.J. Sutton3 and S. Thomas4

From the 1Medical Care Research Unit and 2Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, 3Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, and 4Sheffield Vascular Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Address correspondence to Dr S. Goodacre, Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA. email: s.goodacre{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Received 21 February 2006 and in revised form 21 March 2006

Background: Many different approaches are used to diagnose suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), but there has been little formal comparison of strategies.

Aim: To identify the most cost-effective strategy for the UK National Health Service (NHS).

Design: Systematic review, meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Methods: We identified 18 strategies and estimated the diagnostic performance of constituent tests by systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of testing and treatment were estimated from published data or by an expert panel. Costs were estimated from NHS reference costs and published data. We built a decision-analysis model to estimate, for each strategy, the overall accuracy, costs, and outcomes (valued as quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs), compared to a 'no testing, no treatment' alternative. Probabilistic analysis estimated the net benefit of each strategy at varying thresholds for willingness to pay for health gain.

Results: At the thresholds for willingness to pay recommended by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (£20 000–£30 000 per QALY), the optimal strategy was to discharge patients with a low or intermediate Wells score and negative D-dimer, limiting ultrasound to those with a high score or positive D-dimer. Strategies using radiological testing for all patients were only cost-effective at £40 000 per QALY or more.

Discussion: The optimal strategy for DVT diagnosis is to use ultrasound selectively in patients with a high clinical risk or positive D-dimer. Radiological testing for all patients does not appear to be a cost-effective use of health service resources.


Steve Goodacre, UK Department of Health. This article is covered by Crown Copyright as a part of the funding contract between the University of Sheffield (Principal Investigator: Steve Goodacre) and the UK Department of Health.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. J. Sutton, N. J. Cooper, S. Goodacre, and M. Stevenson
Integration of Meta-analysis and Economic Decision Modeling for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 650 - 667.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
Y. Kanno, K. Kobayashi, H. Takane, H. Arima, N. Ikeda, J. Shoda, and H. Suzuki
Elevation of plasma D-dimer is closely associated with venous thrombosis produced by double-lumen catheter in pre-dialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1224 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.