Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on February 14, 2006
QJM 2006 99(3):135-141; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcl013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/3/135    most recent
hcl013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sekhri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Timmis, A.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sekhri, N.
Right arrow Articles by Timmis, A.D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rapid-access chest pain clinics and the traditional cardiology out-patient clinic

N. Sekhri1,, G.S. Feder2, C. Junghans3, H. Hemingway3 and A.D. Timmis2

From the 1Newham University Hospital, London, 2Barts and The London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London and 3Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL Medical School, London, UK

Address correspondence to Dr N. Sekhri, Newham University Hospital, Glen Road, Plaistow London E13 8SL. email: neha.sekhri{at}newhamhealth.nhs.uk

Received 22 September 2005 and in revised form 24 November 2005

Background: The National Service Framework for coronary heart disease recommends rapid-access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) for cardiological assessment of new-onset chest pain within 2 weeks of referral.

Aim: To measure the extent to which an RACPC successfully substituted for an out-patient cardiology clinic (OPCC) at a general hospital, in assessing new-onset chest pain referrals.

Methods: Prospective measurement of attendance and waiting times for consecutive patients at the RACPC and OPCC, and multivariate analysis of factors associated with referral for angiography.

Results: From September 2002 to August 2004, 1382 patients with chest pain attended the RACPC, and 228 patients, the OPCC. All RACPC patients were seen within 24 h of referral, except those referred on Friday afternoons, or the day before national holidays. The mean ± SD waiting time for OPCC appointments was 97 ± 43 days. Of 208 OPCC patients, 30 (14%) fulfilled the RACPC referral criterion of recent onset chest pain (<4 weeks duration) vs. 926/1382 (67%) RACPC patients. Thus the RACPC substituted for the OPCC in 926/956 (97%) new chest pain referrals. Patients from the OPCC were 3.82 (95%CI 1.85–7.90) more likely to be referred for a coronary angiogram. compared to those attending the RACPC.

Discussion: The RACPC has provided efficient and effective substitution for the OPCC in the assessment of new chest pain referrals according to pre-defined referral criteria. Broadening the referral criterion of the RACPC to patients with chest pain of >4 weeks duration would result in more referrals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Sekhri, A. Timmis, R. Chen, C. Junghans, N. Walsh, J. Zaman, S. Eldridge, H. Hemingway, and G. Feder
Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris
BMJ, May 10, 2008; 336(7652): 1058 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Junghans, G. Feder, A. D. Timmis, S. Eldridge, N. Sekhri, N. Black, P. Shekelle, and H. Hemingway
Effect of Patient-Specific Ratings vs Conventional Guidelines on Investigation Decisions in Angina: Appropriateness of Referral and Investigation in Angina (ARIA) Trial
Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2007; 167(2): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.