Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on May 6, 2005
QJM 2005 98(6):415-425; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/6/415    most recent
hci065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Exel, N.J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Huijsman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Exel, N.J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Huijsman, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services

N.J.A. van Exel1,2, M.A. Koopmanschap1,2, W. Scholte op Reimer3, L.W. Niessen1,2 and R. Huijsman2

From the 1Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), 2Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), and 3Department of Cardiology, Clinical Epidemiology & Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Address correspondence to Dr N.J.A. van Exel, Erasmus MC, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Office WL4-121, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e-mail: n.vanexel{at}erasmusmc.nl

Received 24 August 2004 and in revised form 12 January 2005

Background: Randomized trials have shown that integrating services for acute stroke care may lead to organizational improvements, higher efficiency and better patient outcomes in the acute phase.

Aim: To compare the costs and effects of stroke services in an experimental group of patients compared to a group of patients receiving conventional care.

Design: Prospective non-randomized controlled trial.

Methods: We compared all consecutively hospitalized stroke patients in three experimental stroke service settings (Delft, Haarlem and Nijmegen, n = 411) with concurrent patients receiving conventional stroke care (n = 187) over 6 months follow-up. Main end-points were total costs per patient and total health-adjusted days per 100 patients as measured by the EuroQol-5D score during follow-up.

Results: Mean total costs per patient were {euro}16 000 (95%CI {euro}14 670–{euro}16 930): {euro}13 160 in Delft, {euro}16 790 in Haarlem, {euro}20 230 in Nijmegen, and {euro}13 810 in the control regions. Early discharge in Delft saved about {euro}2500 hospital costs per patient. General patient health in Delft was significantly better than in the control regions; Haarlem and Nijmegen showed no difference in health.

Discussion: Our study confirms the potential to improve stroke outcomes in a cost-effective way in Dutch settings. This was seen in the group of patients in Delft, a complete and relatively simple stroke service, but not in two other regions with more complex stroke services. Important factors are reduction of hospital days and, most likely, adequate multidisciplinary rehabilitation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. Lo, K. Zamel, K. Ponnappa, A. Allen, D. Chisolm, M. Tang, B. Kerlin, and K. O. Yeates
The Cost of Pediatric Stroke Care and Rehabilitation
Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 161 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.