Skip Navigation

QJM 2005 98(1):41-51; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, M.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Lebeau, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beaulieu, M.-D.
Right arrow Articles by Lebeau, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

QJM vol. 98 no. 1 © Association of Physicians 2005; all rights reserved.

Physicians' attitudes to the pharmacological treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris

M.-D. Beaulieu1, J. Brophy2, A. Jacques3, R. Blais4, R.N. Battista5 and R. Lebeau1

From the 1Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 2Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, 3Collège des médecins du Québec, 4Département d'administration de la santé, Université de Montréal, and 5Agence d’évaluation des technologies et des modes d'intervention en santé and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Background: Little is known about how physicians’ knowledge of and attitudes to practice guidelines for stable angina may influence their implementation.

Aim: To explore the association between physicians’ demographics, their knowledge, and opinions about stable angina and their self-reported adherence to guideline recommendations.

Design: Questionnaire-based survey.

Methods: We surveyed 1228 Quebec physicians using a questionnaire based on the ‘awareness-to-adherence’ conceptual framework to measure their adherence with recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of stable angina. Independent predictors of adherence with the targeted recommendations were determined by stepwise linear regression analysis.

Results: We received 877 (71.4%) responses from the 1228 eligible physicians. More than 90% of respondents were aware of and agreed with the targeted recommendations. However, the adoption rate varied, even among physicians who generally agreed with the guidelines. Factor analysis indicated that most physicians agreed with recommendations concerning ASA. More negative attitudes were expressed toward ß-blockers and hypolipaemic drugs. Respondents trusted the recommendations of a variety of scientific and professional organizations. Awareness, agreement, and adoption were the strongest predictors of adherence for the three recommendations. Physician demographics and practice characteristics did not predict adherence.

Discussion: Physicians were aware of and agreed with the recommendations, so additional large-scale dissemination of the guidelines would be unlikely to improve prescription patterns. However, negative attitudes about ß-blockers and hypolipaemic therapy affected adherence to recommendations for these drugs. Continuing medical education interventions involving local opinion leaders might address some of the obstacles identified.

Address correspondence to Professor M.-D. Beaulieu, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Pavillon L.-C. Simard, 8e étage1560, rue Sherbrooke Est., Montréal (Québec), Canada H2L 4M1. e-mail: maried.beaulieu{at}sympatico.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.