Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chataway, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, K.N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chataway, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, K.N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2004; 97: 325-330
QJM vol. 97 no. 6 © Association of Physicians 2004; all rights reserved.

Herpes simplex encephalitis: an audit of the use of laboratory diagnostic tests

J. Chataway1, N.W.S. Davies2,3,4, S. Farmer1, R.S. Howard1,2, E.J. Thompson3 and K.N. Ward5

From the Departments of 1Neurology, 2Neurological Intensive Care and 3Neuroimmunology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, 4Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Guy's, King's and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, London, and 5Department of Clinical Virology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK

Received 17 November 2003 and in revised form 5 March 2004

Background: The combination of both PCR and intrathecal antibody studies is recommended to confirm or refute the diagnosis of herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE).

Aim: To investigate the pattern of use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of suspected cases of HSE, and to determine the final diagnosis in cases proven not to be HSE.

Design: Structured audit.

Methods: We reviewed the case-notes of all patients who, over a five-year time period, presented with suspected encephalitis; and/or were prescribed aciclovir. Clinical and laboratory criteria were used to categorize the likelihood of HSE.

Results: We identified 222 patients: 10 (5%) had definite HSE, 24 (10%) possible HSE, and 144 (65%) a definite alternative diagnosis. In 44 (20%), no final diagnosis was made, but the diagnosis of HSE was excluded. PCR was performed in 68 (31%), intrathecal antibody studies in 24 (11%), and brain biopsy in 17 (8%). A wide range of diseases mimicked HSE, but most common were inflammatory diseases and other infections of the central nervous system.

Discussion: Laboratory tests, particularly intrathecal antibody assays, are under-used in the diagnosis of HSE. Although early empirical treatment of suspected HSE is essential, confirmation or exclusion of the diagnosis is equally important to avoid overlooking alternative diagnoses. Identification of the aetiology of encephalitis is of particular importance, given the current concerns of emerging infections and bioterrorism.

Address correspondence to: Dr J. Chataway, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG. e-mail: jeremy.chataway{at}st-marys.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PNHome page
T. Solomon, I. J Hart, and N. J Beeching
Viral encephalitis: a clinician's guide
Practical Neurology, October 1, 2007; 7(5): 288 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
E J Thompson
Lock and key approach to "hidden" encephalitis.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2006; 77(8): 901 - 901.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.