Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, M.A.
Right arrow Articles by Farrington, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, M.A.
Right arrow Articles by Farrington, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2004; 97: 289-292
QJM vol. 97 no. 5 (c) Association of Physicians 2004; all rights reserved.

Polymyalgia rheumatica preceding small-vessel vasculitis: changed spots or misdiagnosis?

M.A. Little, L. Nazar and K. Farrington

From the Department of Nephrology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK

Received 26 November 2003 and in revised form 16 February 2004

Background: Systemic small-vessel vasculitis (SVV) is increasing in incidence and age of diagnosis. Presenting features may mimic those of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), a common disease of the elderly.

Aim: To test the hypotheses that SVV is frequently misdiagnosed as PMR in elderly patients, that this results in a delay in diagnosis and appropriate treatment, and that the natural history and clinical features are different.

Design: Retrospective case-control study.

Methods: Cases of glomerulonephritis due to SVV at a single centre over a 12-year period were analysed, comparing those treated previously for PMR (PMR+) to the remainder of the cohort (PMR).

Results: Of 86 patients with complete follow-up, 13% had been treated previously for PMR. PMR+ patients had a longer duration of symptoms prior to SVV diagnosis (396 vs. 107 days, p = 0.001) and were less likely to be dialysis-dependent at diagnosis (36% vs. 68%, p < 0.05). Despite the delay in diagnosis, there was a trend towards lower serum creatinine (392 vs. 591 µM), lower relapse rate (0.04 versus 0.15 episodes/patient-year) and lower incidence of death/end-stage renal failure (27% vs. 53%) in the PMR+ group.

Discussion: SVV is frequently misdiagnosed as PMR, especially in those patients with indolent disease, although this did not appear to adversely affect outcome. We recommend that all patients suspected of suffering from PMR undergo careful urinalysis to look for haematuria or proteinuria, and that a low threshold for ANCA testing is maintained.

Address correspondence to Dr K. Farrington, Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, Herts SG1 4AB. e-mail: Ken.Farrington{at}nhs.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.