Skip Navigation

QJM 2004 97(12):797-801; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hch128
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, M.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, M.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

QJM vol. 97 no. 12 © Association of Physicians 2004; all rights reserved.

Preventing venous thromboembolism in acute medical patients

A. Elis1 and M.H. Ellis2

From the 1Department of Medicine and 2Blood Bank, Sapir Medical Center, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

Received 12 May 2004 and in revised form 6 September 2004

Background: While extensive data support the clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of routine thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients, the use of this approach in medical patients has been controversial. However, recent data, mainly from the MEDENOX trial, support routine thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.

Aim: To determine attitudes towards VTE prevention in such patients, in departments of internal medicine in Israel.

Design: Questionnaire-based survey.

Methods: A questionnaire regarding aspects of VTE prophylaxis was mailed to all heads of internal medicine departments in Israel (n = 90). The questionnaire also included data concerning VTE prevention measures in specific acute medical illnesses, based on the MEDENOX study population.

Results: Fifty-eight (64%) departments returned the questionnaire. Forty-seven (81%) of them considered VTE a clinical problem in their departments, but only 37 (63%) had a routine VTE prevention policy. The most frequently used modality for VTE prophylaxis was low-molecular-weight heparin. There was little agreement concerning the exact indications or risk factors in which VTE prophylaxis measures should be used, except the combination of acute medical disabling illness and previous VTE.

Discussion: The results emphasize the need for detailed guidelines and risk assessment models for VTE prevention treatments in acutely ill medical patients, as well as better education for physicians.

Address correspondence to Dr A. Elis, Department of Medicine ‘A’, Sapir Medical Center, Meir Hospital, 44281 Kfar Saba, Israel. e-mail: avishayel{at}clalit.org.il


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.