Skip Navigation

QJM 2004 97(10):655-661; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hch111
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hillis, G.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.A.L.
Right arrow Articles by Hillis, G.S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

QJM vol. 97 no. 10 © Association of Physicians 2004; all rights reserved.

Reducing call-to-needle times: the critical role of pre-hospital thrombolysis

J.A.L. Smith1, K.P. Jennings1, E.A. Anderson1, P. Green2 and G.S. Hillis1

1Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and 2Kemnay Medical Group/Scottish Council for Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, UK

Received 31 March 2004 and in revised form 17 June 2004

Background: Current guidelines recommend that patients with acute myocardial infarction should receive thrombolysis within 60 min of seeking professional help.

Aim: To compare current rates of pre-hospital thrombolysis in Grampian with historical data, and assess the effect of pre-hospital thrombolysis on the proportion of patients achieving ‘call-to-needle’ times within national guidelines.

Design: Prospective audit.

Methods: Data were collected on all patients (n = 535) admitted to the coronary care unit and thrombolysed, either in hospital or in the community from July 2000 to June 2002, using standardized forms.

Results: One hundred and thirty-three patients (25%) received pre-hospital thrombolysis and 402 (75%) received in-hospital thrombolysis. This compares with a 19% (195/1046) pre-hospital thrombolysis rate in the mid-1990s (p = 0.005). Median ‘call-to-needle’ times were 45 min for pre-hospital thrombolysis and 105 min for patients who received in-hospital thrombolysis (p < 0.001). Only 24% (96/396) of patients receiving in-hospital thrombolysis were treated within the recommended guideline, vs. 79% (88/111) of pre-hospital thrombolysis patients (p < 0.001).

Discussion: Pre-hospital thrombolysis rates in Grampian are increasing. Administration of thrombolysis in the community greatly increases the proportion of patients achieving a ‘call-to-needle’ time of 60 min, with a median time saving of ~1 h.

Address correspondence to Dr G. Hillis, Cardiac Research Department, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN. e-mail: g.hillis{at}abdn.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.