Q J Med 2003; 96: 673-685
© 2003 Association of Physicians
Commentary |
Dexamphetamine treatment in stroke
From the Department of Elderly Care, St Lukes Hospital, Bradford, UK
Reducing disability and dependency after a stroke is an important clinical objective. We examine what is known about the use of dexamphetamine in patients recovering from an acute stroke, and consider whether further clinical studies should be undertaken. Dexamphetamine has repeatedly been shown to enhance recovery after experimental brain injury in animals, the best effects being seen when dexamphetamine is combined with lesion-specific motor training or sensory stimulation. Postulated mechanisms for these beneficial effects in animals are in keeping with contemporary theories of neurophysiological rehabilitation in man. There have been few clinical studies of dexamphetamine during rehabilitation after an acute stroke. Four controlled trials demonstrated a tendency to an improved outcome when dexamphetamine was paired with therapy and administered 330 days after an ischaemic stroke. However, clinical studies to date have been small, included only highly selected patients, and have not addressed possible confounding effects of the drug on mood and untreated depression. Dexamphetamine has previously been used under supervision in medically ill patients and appears to be safe and well-tolerated. There is a need for well-designed studies to assess further the safety and efficacy of dexamphetamine in rehabilitation after stroke.
Address correspondence to Dr D. Long, Department of Elderly Care, St Lukes Hospital, Bradford BD5 ONA. e-mail: john.young{at}bradfordhospitals.nhs.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Barbay, E. V. Zoubina, N. Dancause, S. B. Frost, I. Eisner-Janowicz, A. M. Stowe, E. J. Plautz, and R. J. Nudo A Single Injection of d-Amphetamine Facilitates Improvements in Motor Training Following a Focal Cortical Infarct in Squirrel Monkeys. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 455 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
