Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cock, H.R.
Right arrow Articles by Schapira, A.H.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cock, H.R.
Right arrow Articles by Schapira, A.H.V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2002; 95: 225-231
© 2002 Association of Physicians

A comparison of lorazepam and diazepam as initial therapy in convulsive status epilepticus

H.R. Cock1, and A.H.V. Schapira1,2

1 From the Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, London, and 2 University Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK

Received 4 January 2002 and in revised form 1 February 2002

Background: Previous trials have suggested lorazepam may be superior to diazepam as first-line treatment of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE), with improved seizure outcome, and a lower incidence of side-effects. Many published guidelines however still recommend diazepam.

Aim: To compare the efficacy, safety and cost of lorazepam compared to diazepam, in adults with CSE.

Design: Retrospective case note audit.

Methods: Cases of CSE were retrospectively identified over two 18-month periods either side of the introduction of a new management protocol in May 1997, in which lorazepam 4 mg i.v. was substituted for diazepam 10 mg i.v. as first-line treatment for CSE. Diagnostic codes for all admissions and casualty presentations of patients over 16 years of age were examined for primary or secondary codes including ‘epilepsy’, ‘fits’ or ‘status epilepticus’. Medical records and casualty notes were reviewed to identify CSE cases. Treatment groups were compared using ANOVA and a Tukey post hoc analysis. Treatment success was defined as cessation of seizures without recurrence in the subsequent 12 h.

Results: In both premonitory and established CSE, both drugs were equally effective at terminating seizures, but significantly fewer seizure recurrences followed lorazepam, and fewer repeat doses were needed. There were no differences in reported adverse events or in drug costs.

Discussion: We recommend that lorazepam be the first-line therapy in preference to diazepam in adults with CSE.

Address correspondence to Dr H.R. Cock, Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG. h.cock{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
D. J. Costello and A. J. Cole
Treatment of Acute Seizures and Status Epilepticus
J Intensive Care Med, November 1, 2007; 22(6): 319 - 347.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
S. S. Chung, N. C. Wang, and D. M. Treiman
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Antiepileptic Drugs for the Treatment of Status Epilepticus
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 137 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
U. Idrees and M. Londner
Pharmacotherapy Overview of Seizure Management in the Adult Emergency Department
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2005; 18(5): 394 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Devi, V. J. Castro, J. Huitink, D. Buitelaar, T. Kosten, and P. O'Connor
Management of Drug and Alcohol Withdrawal
N. Engl. J. Med., July 24, 2003; 349(4): 405 - 407.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.