Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boulos, P.B.
Right arrow Articles by Tovey, F.I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boulos, P.B.
Right arrow Articles by Tovey, F.I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2002; 95: 749-752
© 2002 Association of Physicians

Possible absence of Helicobacter pylori in the early stages of duodenal ulceration

P.B. Boulos, A. Botha, M. Hobsley, J. Holton1, A.O. Oshowo and F.I. Tovey

From the Departments of Surgery and 1 Medical Microbiology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK

Received 3 October 2001 Accepted for publication 6 June 2002.

BackgroundHelicobacter pylori is thought to be a cause of duodenal ulceration, but there is some evidence that it is found less often in early than in later disease.

Aim: To assess the presence of H. pylori in patients undergoing endoscopy for dyspepsia, with respect to their duration of symptoms.

Design: Retrospective case note review.

Methods: Patients were categorized as having a history greater or less than 6 months, and as H. pylori-positive or -negative, using biopsy rapid urease, culture and PCR tests.

Results: Thirty-two duodenal ulcer patients with a history >6 months were all H. pylori-positive according to the PCR test; the five with a shorter history were H. pylori-negative. No patient H. pylori-negative by PCR was positive by the other tests.

DiscussionH. pylori was (at least) less commonly present before 6 months. It is possible that H. pylori, although nearly always present after 6 months, is not present at the onset of the disease. Confirmation of this finding would imply that infection with the organism is not the cause of duodenal ulceration, but a factor producing recurrence and chronicity.

Address correspondence to Professor M. Hobsley, Fieldside, Barnet Lane, London N20 8AS. e-mail: m.hobsley{at}ucl.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Hobsley, F. I Tovey, K. D. Bardhan, and J. Holton
Does Helicobacter pylori really cause duodenal ulcers? No
BMJ, August 14, 2009; 339(aug14_1): b2788 - b2788.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.