Q J Med 2002; 95: 671-676
© 2002 Association of Physicians
Skin disease in Gulf war veterans
From the Dermatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, and 1 Gulf War Illness Research Unit, Guy's, King's & St Thomas' Medical School, London, UK
Received 27 February 2002 and in revised form 13 June 2002
Background: Gulf war veterans report more symptomatic ill-health than other military controls, and skin disease is one of the most frequent reasons for military personnel to seek medical care.
Aim: To compare the nature and prevalence of skin disease in UK Gulf veterans with non-Gulf veterans, and to assess whether skin disease is associated with disability.
Design: Prospective case comparison study.
Methods: Disabled (n=111) and non-disabled (n=98) Gulf veterans and disabled non-Gulf veterans (n=133) were randomly selected from representative cohorts of those who served in the Gulf conflict 19901991, UN Bosnia Peacekeeping Force 19921997, or veterans in active service between 199091, but not deployed to the Gulf. Disability was defined as reduced physical functioning as measured by the Short Form 36 [score <72.2]. All subjects recruited were examined by a dermatologist, blind to the military and health status of the veteran.
Results: The prevalences of skin disease in disabled Gulf, non-disabled Gulf and disabled non-Gulf veterans were 47.7, 36.7, and 42.8% respectively. Seborrhoeic dermatitis was twice as common as expected in the Gulf veterans (both disabled and non-disabled).
Discussion: Skin disease does not appear to be contributing to ill health in Gulf war veterans, with the exception of an unexplained two-fold increase in seborrhoeic dermatitis.
Address correspondence to Dr E.M. Higgins, Dermatology Department, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS. e-mail: elisabeth.higgins{at}kcl.ac.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Hotopf and S. Wessely Can epidemiology clear the fog of war? Lessons from the 1990-91 Gulf War Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2005; 34(4): 791 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
