Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karstaedt, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karstaedt, A.S.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2001; 94: 101-105
© 2001 Association of Physicians

The utility of bone-marrow examination in HIV-infected adults in South Africa

A.S. Karstaedt1,, L. Pantanowitz1,2, T. Omar2, H.E.M. Sonnendecker2 and M. Patel1

1 From the Department of Medicine, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital 2 Department of Anatomical Pathology, South African Institute for Medical Research, and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Received 16 February 2000 and in revised form 27 November 2000

We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive case series of 257 adults with HIV infection who had undergone a bone-marrow examination with trephine bone biopsy, to assess the diagnostic usefulness of bone-marrow examination and evaluate possible predictors of a diagnostic examination. Bone-marrow examination was positive in 97 (38%) patients and gave a unique diagnosis in 61 (24%). The diseases were tuberculosis (83 patients), Mycobacterium avium complex infection and cryptococcosis (four patients each), and haematological malignancies (eight patients). The yield of the examination was significantly increased, by univariate analysis, in patients with wasting, oral thrush, leukopenia, CD4<=100/mm3, and granuloma formation on histopathology. Granulomata were present in 113 (44%) patients, of whom 28 (25%) had no specific cause identified. Granulomata occurred in 22 (25%) of 89 patients with CD4 >100/mm3 compared to 36 (51%) of 70 patients with CD4<=100/mm3 (OR 0.3; 95%CI 0.15–0.62). Of 48 patients with CD4 <50/mm3, 25 had granulomata, including 15 with caseation necrosis. The yield of bone-marrow examination was considerable in our setting. Expanding access to modern blood culture techniques for mycobacteria to primary care level could limit the number of bone-marrow examinations required.

Address correspondence to Dr A.S. Karstaedt, Department of Medicine, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, P.O. Bertsham, 2013, Johannesburg, South Africa. e-mail: 014alan{at}chiron.wits.ac.za


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.