Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLaren, J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Luqmani, R.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLaren, J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Luqmani, R.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 2001; 94: 615-621
© 2001 Association of Physicians

The diagnostic value of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody testing in a routine clinical setting

J.S. McLaren, R.H. Stimson, E.R. McRorie, J.E. Coia1 and R.A. Luqmani

From the Rheumatic Diseases Unit and 1 Department of Clinical Microbiology and Immunology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

Received 10 July 2001 and in revised form 5 September 2001

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) tests are a routine clinical assay in most UK hospitals. We examined the role of routine ANCA testing in achieving a diagnosis of systemic vasculitis in a routine clinical setting. From April 1996 to March 2000, 2734 samples from five hospital departments were tested for ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) at a single laboratory. After April 1999, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed on all IIF-positive samples. Clinical diagnosis was determined for all patients with a positive IIF ANCA, and a sample of the ANCA-negative patients. Some 2–18% of patients with suspected ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis (AASV) had positive IIF ANCA. The AASV diagnosis was confirmed in 0–56% of these cases. Analysis by department suggested that 88–100% of patients with a positive IIF ANCA did not have AASV, except in the Rheumatology department. The positive predictive value (PPV) of IIF ANCA for AASV was 59% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 84%. Of the patients with proven AASV, 41% did not have ANCA on IIF. Combined ANCA testing by IIF/ELISA had a higher sensitivity and PPV but lower specificity than IIF alone for AASV. For the combined IIF/ELISA test, only the Rheumatology department had a sensitivity or PPV >0% for AASV. The PPV of ANCA by IIF/ELISA for AASV was 79% and the NPV was 63%. The ANCA test is being widely applied with very poor return. Guidelines for more effective usage are proposed.

Address correspondence to Dr R.A. Luqmani, Consultant Rheumatologist/Part Time Senior Lecturer, Rheumatic Diseases Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK. e-mail: Raashid.Luqmani{at}ed.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
E Suresh
Diagnostic approach to patients with suspected vasculitis.
Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2006; 82(970): 483 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
D. R. Friedman and S. D. Wolfsthal
Cocaine-Induced Pseudovasculitis
Mayo Clin. Proc., May 1, 2005; 80(5): 671 - 673.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
R J Lock
Rational requesting or rationing testing?
J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2004; 57(2): 121 - 122.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
D Sinclair, M Saas, and J M Stevens
The effect of a symptom related "gating policy" on ANCA requests in routine clinical practice
J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2004; 57(2): 131 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.