Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, L.
Right arrow Articles by Calverley, P.M.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, L.
Right arrow Articles by Calverley, P.M.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 1999; 92: 395-400
© 1999 Association of Physicians

Oral corticosteroid trials in the management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

L. Davies, M. Nisar, M.G. Pearson, R.W. Costello, J.E. Earis and P.M.A. Calverley

From the Aintree Chest Centre, University Hospital Aintree and University Department of Medicine, Liverpool, UK

Received 17 November 1998 and in revised form 5 May 1999

Address correspondence to Professor P.M.A. Calverley, Aintree Chest Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL

Although recent guidelines for managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend a trial of oral corticosteroids in the initial assessment, its prognostic value remains unclear. We prospectively studied 127 adults (64% men) with stable COPD (FEV1/FVC <60%) over 1 year. At entry, we measured lung volumes, gas transfer factor, respiratory symptoms (by questionnaire), and peripheral blood eosinophil count. Skin-prick testing was done, and spirometry after nebulized 5 mg salbutamol and, after 2 weeks, oral prednisolone. Physician A gave all patients inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (800 mcg/day), whereas physician B prescribed this only to those with a positive oral corticosteroid trial. At 1 year, spirometry and respiratory questionnaire were repeated, with an estimate of overall symptom severity on a visual analogue scale. Follow-up data were available in 104 (82%) patients. Of these, 32 (31%) were unresponsive to salbutamol and prednisolone; 48 (46%) were responsive to beta agonists but not to corticosteroids, and 24 (23%) responded to corticosteroids and salbutamol. Patients in all groups were comparable, except that the prednisolone responders had a higher mean eosinophil count (p<0.001) and more were ex-smokers (p<0.001). Only the response to oral prednisolone correlated with the change in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 over 1 year. Oral prednisolone responders had higher FEV1 at 1 year (p<0.02) and significantly lower symptom scores (p<0.02). In COPD, corticosteroid trials contribute information additional to that gained from nebulized bronchodilator reversibility testing. Patients with a positive response to a corticosteroid trial are more likely to have improved symptomatically and spirometrically at 1 year.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P.M. Calverley, W. Boonsawat, Z. Cseke, N. Zhong, S. Peterson, and H. Olsson
Maintenance therapy with budesonide and formoterol in chronicobstructive pulmonary disease
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2003; 22(6): 912 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. E. Epstein
Inhaled Corticosteroids and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Are We Barking Up the Wrong Tracheobronchial Tree?
Ann Intern Med, June 17, 2003; 138(12): 1001 - 1002.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P.M.A. Calverley
Modern treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Eur. Respir. J., July 2, 2001; 18(34_suppl): 60S - 66s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.