Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Covic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ackrill, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Covic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ackrill, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 1999; 92: 251-260
© 1999 Association of Physicians

Long-hours home haemodialysis—the best renal replacement therapy method?

A. Covic, D.J.A. Goldsmith1, M.C. Venning2 and P. Ackrill2

From the Renal Unit, Parhon Hospital, Iasi, Romania, 1 Renal Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, and 2 Renal Unit, Withington Hospital, Manchester, UK

Received 20 November 1998 and in revised form 18 February 1999

Dr A. Covic, Nephrology CWRU/MHMC, 2500 Metrohealth Drive, Rammelkamp R203, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-1998, USA e-mail: amc21{at}po.cwru.edu

Two hundred and eighty-six patients (190 males and 96 females) with end-stage renal failure (ESRD) started haemodialysis (HD) at Withington Hospital between 1 January 1968 and 31 December 1986. Of these, 152 (53.1%) were successfully transplanted, while 134 had only HD or one transplant lasting <3 months (i.e. total HD interruption <3 months). For the whole group, the probabilities of being alive on long-hours home HD at 10 and 20 years were 58.7% and 33.2%, respectively. Mean gross mortality 1968–1986 was 6.5±3.2% per year. The main causes of death were cardiovascular (36.6%), infection-related (19.2%) and malignancy (9.6%). Males and younger cohorts had a significantly (p<0.05) higher probability of being alive on long-hours home HD than did females and older cohorts. Eighty-two patients (29% of the total group) survived more than 10 years, of whom 54 were still alive at 1 January 1996: 44 continuing on HD while the other ten had been successfully transplanted. In these 54 patients, mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure recorded at the date of the study was 117.6/68.9 mmHg; mean BP for the last 5 years on HD was 136.4/81.2 mmHg. Only four (7.4%) were regularly taking antihypertensive medication. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (by ECG) was present in 64.8% of the 54 patients; its prevalence by echocardiography (LVM index >130 g/m2 for men and >110 g/m2 for women) was 77.5%. Only 10 (18.5%) had symptoms or clinical signs of ischaemic heart disease and/or peripheral vascular disease. None had cardiac failure symptoms NYHA class 3–4. Our data show a low incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, confirming those from the Tassin unit in France, and make a medical case for extended haemodialysis treatment hours.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Covic, P. Gusbeth-Tatomir, and D. Goldsmith
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1779 - 1780.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. Jindal, C. T. Chan, C. Deziel, D. Hirsch, S. D. Soroka, M. Tonelli, and B. F. Culleton
CHAPTER 5: Frequent and Sustained Hemodialysis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 17(3_suppl_1): S24 - S27.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. H. Scribner, C. R. Blagg, E. A. Friedman, N. A. Hoenich, F. Locatelli, T. Greene, A. K. Cheung, G. Eknoyan, the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study Group, and J. Himmelfarb
Effect of Dialysis Dose and Membrane Flux in Maintenance Hemodialysis
N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 2003; 348(15): 1491 - 1494.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.