Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KEE, F.
Right arrow Articles by GAFFNEY, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KEE, F.
Right arrow Articles by GAFFNEY, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 1995; 88: 15-22
© 1995 Association of Physicians

Priority for coronary artery surgery: who gets by-passed when demand outstrips capacity?

F. KEE and B. GAFFNEY

Department of Epidemiology, Queen's University Belfast, and Eastern Health and Social Services Board Northern Ireland, UK

Address correspondence to Dr F. Kee, Department of Public Health Medicine, Northern Health and Social Services Board, County Hall, Ballymena BT42 1QB

Received 5 September 1994 Accepted for publication 6 October 1994.


   Abstract

We investigated the clinical and non-clinical factors which influence the waiting time from initial angiography to bypass surgery, by follow-up of a random sample of 141 patients undergoing their first coronary angiography, for whom a decision to revascularize was made in 1991. The period between the date of angiography and the date of surgery, and a variety of clinical patient characteristics, were retrieved from medical notes in mid-1993. Patients were sampled from those investigated in the two Northern Ireland catheterization laboratories in Belfast, both of which were served by one local surgical centre. Of the 141 patients studied, 86 had had surgery at follow-up. The most important predictors of waiting time were: the presence of severe stenosis of the left main-stem coronary artery [relative hazards, 3.4 (1.6–7.3)], the presence of unstable angina at the time of angiography, [relative hazards, 2.2 (0.97–5.0)], age at angiography, [relative hazards, 2.2 (1.1–4.2) for >65 years vs. <50 years], having a positive family history of premature coronary artery disease in a first-degree relative, [relative hazards, 1.8 (1.1–2.9)] and smoking habit at angiography, [relative hazards 0.6 (0.3–1.1), for current vs. never/ex-smokers]. More weight appears to be given to maximizing life extension rather than its quality enhancement in determining who gets priority for surgery. The exception to this may be in regard to smokers, and purchasers might find it useful to set targets for secondary prevention activities with respect to such patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.