Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEPBURN, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by BEVERIDGE, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HEPBURN, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by BEVERIDGE, G. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 1993; 86: 715-717
© 1993 Association of Physicians


research-article

The role of skin biopsies in bone marrow transplant recipients

N. C. HEPBURN1,, K. M. McLAREN2, M. L. TURNER3 and G. W. BEVERIDGE1

1From the Departments of Dermatology, The Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, UK 2From the Pathology, The Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, UK 3From the Haematology, The Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, UK

Address correspondence to Dr N. C. Hepburn, Department of Dermatology, Level 4, Lauriston Building, The Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh EH3 9YW

Received 20 July 1993 Accepted for publication 19 August 1993.

Bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients frequently develop rashes as a consequence of their disease, its treatment or because of a complication such as infection. These rashes are often clinically atypical, yet appropriate management is dependent upon correct diagnosis and therefore a skin biopsy is often performed. In a group of 101 consecutive BMT recipients, 25 patients had a total of 34 skin biopsies. A specific histopathological diagnosis was made in 65% (22/34), including graft vs. host disease (GVHD) (15 cases), infection (4 cases), drug reaction (1 case) and recurrent lymphoma (1 case). Therapy was changed following the biopsy in 77% (17/22) of these cases. In 35% (12/34) the histological changes were non-specific, however, in 10 of these cases GVHD had been suspected clinically and its exclusion was therefore useful. Skin biopsy is of considerable value in the diagnosis and subsequent management of BMT recipients who develop a rash.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.