Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by SHARP, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARKS, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by SHARP, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 1981; 50: 307-319
© 1981 Association of Physicians


research-article

Rheumatoid Cervical Myelopathy

J. S. MARKS and J. SHARP

From the Withington Hospital Manchester

Accepted for publication 6 March 1981.

The mode of presentation and the factors which influenced the diagnosis and outcome in 31 patients with rheumatoid cervical myelopathy were reviewed. The presenting features included paraesthesiae and/or numbness (23 cases) weakness (six) flexor spasms (five) and incontinence (two). Isolated sensory loss presenting in a glove and stocking distribution was often misdiagnosed as a peripheral neuropathy. Multiple neurological deficits were eventually present in all patients and included spastic quadriparesis (17), spastic paraparesis (seven), bladder disturbance (nine), and cranial nerve deficits (six). Twenty-seven patients had impaired light touch and pin prick sensation but the sensory level did not correlate with the presumed level of spinal cord compression. Twenty-one patients had dissociation between loss of position and vibration sensation. All patients had one or more cervical luxations; five patients had atlanto-axial luxation alone, five had subaxial luxation alone and the remainder multiple luxations. Neurological improvement was more frequent and of longer duration in those treated by occipito-cervical fusion than in those treated conservatively but fitness for surgery may have selected a group with a better prognosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
J. C M Oostveen, M. A F J van de Laar, J. A G Geelen, and R. de Graaff
Successful conservative treatment of rheumatoid subaxial subluxation resulting in improvement of myelopathy, reduction of subluxation, and stabilisation of the cervical spine. A report of two cases
Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 1999; 58(2): 126 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.