Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STEPHENS, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by WATTS, R. W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by STEPHENS, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by WATTS, R. W. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Q J Med 1971; 40: 355-370
© 1971 Association of Physicians


research-article

The Treatment of Cystinuria with N-acetyl-D-penicillamine, a Comparison with the Results of D-penicillamine Treatment

A. D. STEPHENS and R. W. E. WATTS1,

From the Medical Professorial Unit, Dunn Laboratories St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, E.C. 1 The Medical Research Council Clinical Research Centre Harrow, Middlesex

1 Present address: Medical Research Council, Clinical Research Centre, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex. HAl 3UJ.

Received 21 September 1970 The results of using N-acetyl-D-penicillamine for the treatment of cystinuria for periods of between 7 months and 2·75 years are reported and compared with those obtained when D-penicillamine is employed.

Both drags reduce the urinary excretion of cystine and their effective doses are similar.

The main side effects encountered were an acute hypersensitivity reaction and proteinuria which developed later and which could not be related to the presence of calculi or infection. Only one mild acute hypersensitivity reaction occurred in the nine patients who took N-acetyl-D-penicillamine. Ten of the 19 patients who were treated with D-penicillamine developed more severe acute hypersensitivity reactions. Desensitization to the drug could, however, be accomplished under cover of prednisolone.

Proteinuria occurred with about equal frequency and severity with both drugs and although it may be heavy, it does not appear to make the renal prognosis markedly worse. Some of the patients with heavy proteinuria also developed oedema and hypoalbuminaemia, but all of these manifestations subsided when the drug was discontinued, a short course of corticosteroid treatment being given in some cases. It was possible to continue treatment in patients with a relatively mild degree of proteinuria in whom there was a very strong indication for doing so.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.