Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on March 18, 2009
QJM 2009 102(5):311-319; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/5/311    most recent
hcp013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newsom-Davis, T.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newsom-Davis, T.
Right arrow Articles by Waxman, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Voodoo dolls and the cancer patient: patients do trust their doctors

T. Newsom-Davis1, L. Kenny1, I. Al-Shakarchi1, J. George2, E. Wong2 and J. Waxman1

From the 1Department of Medical Oncology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road and 2Imperial College London School of Medicine, South Kensington Campus, London, UK

Address correspondence to Prof. Jonathan Waxman, Department of Oncology, Division of Surgery, Oncology, Reproductive Medicine and Anaesthetics (SORA), Imperial College London, Room 1014, Garry Weston Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road London W12 0NN. email: j.waxman{at}imperial.ac.uk

Received 25 November 2008 and in revised form 14 January 2009


  Abstract

Objectives: To determine oncology patients’ pattern and rationale of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use, and canvass their views on the relative merits of allopathic and alternative medicine.

Design: Observational study of opinions from a cohort of patients using self-completion questionnaires.

Setting: Oncology departments of two UK teaching hospitals.

Participants: Voluntary participation of 200 oncology patients attending clinic.

Main findings: Twenty-two percent of patients used CAM, with a preponderance towards younger, female patients. The commonest reasons for CAM use is to make the patient feel better and to help with their cancer. However, patients seldom believe there is more evidence for CAM or that CAM will cure them, indeed often noticing no benefits from the treatment. CAM users do not resort to complementary medicine due to dissatisfaction with their doctor but instead have considerable trust in their physicians. Only a minority believes their doctor knows about their CAM use.

Conclusion: CAM use by oncology patients in the UK is less common than that reported elsewhere. Although patients try CAM in the hope that it will help with their treatment, they are realistic about its likely benefits. It uptake is not as an indication of lack of faith in doctors, yet physicians are frequently unaware of use. Therefore, the medical profession should not feel threatened by patients resorting to CAM but instead focus on understanding the reasons behind it.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.